Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Dec;39(12):2126-34.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3111-9. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

Bleeding and risk of death with hydroxyethyl starch in severe sepsis: post hoc analyses of a randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Bleeding and risk of death with hydroxyethyl starch in severe sepsis: post hoc analyses of a randomized clinical trial

Nicolai Haase et al. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to characterize the degree and clinical importance of bleeding in patients treated with hydroxyethyl starch (HES).

Methods: In post hoc analyses, we examined the associations between fluid assignment, hemostatic variables, bleeding events, transfusions, and death among 798 patients with severe sepsis randomized to fluid resuscitation with HES 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate. We used Cox regression analysis adjusted for fluid assignment and baseline characteristics.

Results: Overall, 93 (23 %) patients assigned to HES versus 60 (15 %) patients assigned to Ringer's acetate bled in the ICU (relative risk (RR) 1.55; 95 % CI 1.16-2.08; P = 0.003). Of these, 38 and 25 (RR 1.52; 95 % CI 0.94-2.48; P = 0.09), respectively, had severe bleeding (intracranial or concomitant transfusion with three units of red blood cells). Most patients bled in the first days after randomization when most trial fluid was given. The hazards ratios for occurrence of any bleeding and severe bleeding in patients treated with HES versus Ringer's acetate were 1.70 (95 % CI 1.23-2.36; P = 0.001) and 1.55 (95 % CI 0.93-2.56; P = 0.09), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios for death among patients with any bleeding and severe bleeding compared to those without bleeding were 1.36 (95 % CI 1.04-1.79; P = 0.03) and 1.74 (95 % CI 1.20-2.53; P = 0.004), respectively.

Conclusions: In post hoc analyses of patient with severe sepsis, treatment with HES increased the risk of bleeding which was associated with increased risk of death. HES-induced bleeding complications may negatively affect outcome in patients with severe sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jul;111(1):187-202 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1266-7; author reply 1267 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1265-6; author reply 1267 - PubMed
    1. Trials. 2011 Jan 27;12:24 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Apr;39(4):558-68 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources