Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;18(1):1-6.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1162-z. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias

M Śmietański  1 , M Szczepkowski, J A Alexandre, D Berger, K Bury, J Conze, B Hansson, A Janes, M Miserez, V Mandala, A Montgomery, S Morales Conde, F Muysoms
Affiliations

European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias

M Śmietański et al. Hernia. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: A classification of parastomal hernias (PH) is needed to compare different populations described in various trials and cohort studies, complete the previous inguinal and ventral hernia classifications of the European Hernia Society (EHS) and will be integrated into the EuraHS database (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias).

Methods: Several members of the EHS board and invited experts gathered for 2 days to discuss the development of an EHS classification of PH. The discussions were based on a literature review and critical appraisal of existing classifications.

Results: The classification proposal is based on the PH defect size (small is ≤5 cm) and the presence of a concomitant incisional hernia (cIH). Four types were defined: Type I, small PH without cIH; Type II, small PH with cIH; Type III, large PH without cIH; and Type IV, large PH with cIH. In addition, the classification grid includes details about whether the hernia recurs after a previous PH repair or whether it is a primary PH. Clinical validation is needed in the future to assess if the classification allows us to differentiate the treatment strategy and if the classification impacts outcome in these different subgroups.

Conclusion: A classification of PH divided into subgroups according to size and cIH was formulated with the aim of improving the ability to compare different studies and their results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The EHS classification for parastomal hernias is a proposal formulated during a consensus meeting in Torun, Poland, on April 20–21, 2012
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examples of the different subgroups of parastomal hernias as defined by the EHS classification
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Muysoms F, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13:407–414. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G. The european hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia. 2007;11:113–116. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0198-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG. EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia. 2012;16:239–250. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0912-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg. 1994;129:413–418. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420280091011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devlin HB, Kingsnorth A. Management of abdominal hernias. Hodder Arnold Publishers: London; 1998. pp. 177–178.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources