Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Oct 25;169(1):35-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.083. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

Benefits and risks of additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms for patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shao-Hui Wu  1 , Wei-Feng Jiang, Jun Gu, Liang Zhao, Yuan-Long Wang, Yu-Gang Liu, Li Zhou, Jia-Ning Gu, Kai Xu, Xu Liu
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Benefits and risks of additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms for patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shao-Hui Wu et al. Int J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: The benefits and risks of additional complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear.

Methods: Trials were identified in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database, reviews, and reference lists of relevant papers. The primary end point was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after a single ablation.

Results: We meta-analyzed 11 studies (total, n=983) using random-effects model to compare PVI (n=478) with PVI plus CFAE ablation (PVI+CFAE) (n=505). Additional CFAE ablation reduced recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after a single procedure (pooled RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61, 0.88; P=0.0007) at ≥ 3-month follow-up. There was no evidence of heterogeneity among studies (I(2)=33%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that additional CFAE ablation reduced rates of recurrence in nonparoxysmal AF (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47, 0.99; P=0.05), whereas had no effect on patients with paroxysmal AF (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.59, 1.06; P=0.12). Eight studies reported results of post-procedure ATs. The addition of CFAE ablation increased the rate of post-procedure ATs (RR 1.77; 95% CI 1.02, 3.07; P=0.04). Additional CFAE ablation significantly increased mean procedural times (245.4+75.7 vs. 189.5+62.3 min, P<0.001), mean fluoroscopy (72.1+25.6 vs. 59.5+19.3 min, P<0.001), and mean RF energy application times (75.3+38.6 vs. 53.2+27.5 min, P<0.001).

Conclusions: The adjunctive CFAE ablation could provide additional benefit in terms of reducing recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia for patients with nonparoxysmal AF but not for patients with paroxysmal AF after a single procedure with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). The main risk of adjunctive CFAE ablation is the increasing rate of untraceable postablation ATs.

Keywords: AADs; AF; ATs; Antiarrhythmic drugs; Atrial fibrillation; CFAE; Catheter ablation; Complex fractionated atrial electrograms; DF; Dominant frequency; LA; Left atria; Meta-analysis; Organized atrial tachyarrhythmias; PVI; Pulmonary vein isolation; RCT; RF; Radiofrequency; Randomized controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms