Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;10(1):208-15.
doi: 10.4161/hv.26600. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

Quality measurement and benchmarking of HPV vaccination services: a new approach

Collaborators, Affiliations

Quality measurement and benchmarking of HPV vaccination services: a new approach

Massimo Maurici et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014.

Abstract

Background: A new measurement process based upon a well-defined mathematical model was applied to evaluate the quality of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination centers in 3 of 12 Local Health Units (ASLs) within the Lazio Region of Italy. The quality aspects considered for evaluation were communicational efficiency, organizational efficiency and comfort.

Results: The overall maximum achievable value was 86.10%, while the HPV vaccination quality scores for ASL1, ASL2 and ASL3 were 73.07%, 71.08%, and 67.21%, respectively.

Conclusions: With this new approach it is possible to represent the probabilistic reasoning of a stakeholder who evaluates the quality of a healthcare provider. All ASLs had margins for improvements and optimal quality results can be assessed in terms of better performance conditions, confirming the relationship between the resulting quality scores and HPV vaccination coverage.

Methods: The measurement process was structured into three steps and involved four stakeholder categories: doctors, nurses, parents and vaccinated women. In Step 1, questionnaires were administered to collect different stakeholders' points of view (i.e., subjective data) that were elaborated to obtain the best and worst performance conditions when delivering a healthcare service. Step 2 of the process involved the gathering of performance data during the service delivery (i.e., objective data collection). Step 3 of the process involved the elaboration of all data: subjective data from step 1 are used to define a "standard" to test objective data from step 2. This entire process led to the creation of a set of scorecards. Benchmarking is presented as a result of the probabilistic meaning of the evaluated scores.

Keywords: comfort; communicational efficiency; human papillomavirus vaccination; organizational efficiency; probability theory; quality indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ricciardi A, Largeron N, Giorgi Rossi P, Raffaele M, Cohet C, Federici A, Palazzo F. Incidence of invasive cervical cancer and direct costs associated with its management in Italy. Tumori. 2009;95:146–52. - PubMed
    1. Capocaccia R, Martina L, Inghelmann R, Crocetti E, De Lisi V, Falcini F, Guzzinati S, Rosso S, Tagliabue G, Tumino R, et al. A method to estimate mortality trends when death certificates are imprecisely coded: an application to cervical cancer in Italy. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1200–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Immunization, Vaccination and Biologicals: Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Last updated: 3 September 2010. http://www.who.int/immunization/topics/hpv/en/
    1. Rodríguez AC, Schiffman M, Herrero R, Wacholder S, Hildesheim A, Castle PE, Solomon D, Burk R, Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste Group Rapid clearance of human papillomavirus and implications for clinical focus on persistent infections. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:513–7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn044. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources