Combination gefitinib and methotrexate compared with methotrexate alone to treat ectopic pregnancy
- PMID: 24084530
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a14cfb
Combination gefitinib and methotrexate compared with methotrexate alone to treat ectopic pregnancy
Abstract
Objective: To determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combination gefitinib and methotrexate to treat ectopic pregnancy.
Methods: We performed a phase I, single-arm (nonrandomized), open-label study. Twelve women with ectopic pregnancies were administered methotrexate (50 mg/m, intramuscular) and 250 mg oral gefitinib in a dose-escalation protocol: one dose (day 1) n=3; three doses (days 1-3) n=3; seven doses (days 1-7) n=6. Efficacy was examined by comparing human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) decline and time to resolution with historic controls administered methotrexate only.
Results: Common side effects were transient acneiform rash in 67% (8/12) and diarrhea in 42% (5/12) of participants. There was no clinical or biochemical evidence of serious pulmonary, renal, hepatic, or hematologic toxicity. Of six participants with a pretreatment serum hCG level between 1,000 and 3,000 international units/L, hCG levels declined significantly faster than in the control group. Median serum hCG levels by day 7 after treatment were less than one fifth of levels observed among 71 historic controls treated with methotrexate alone (median [interquartile range] hCG in participants 261 [55-1,445] international units/L compared with controls 1,426 [940-2,573]; P=.008). Median time for the ectopic pregnancies to resolve with combination therapy was 34% shorter compared with methotrexate alone (21 days compared with 32 days; P=.018).
Conclusion: Combination gefitinib and methotrexate has potential as a treatment for ectopic pregnancy but is commonly associated with minor side effects such as transient rash and diarrhea. The treatment requires validation of safety and efficacy in a larger trial.
Clinical trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, www.anzctr.org, AC'TRN12610000684022.
Level of evidence: : II.
Comment in
-
Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: is there something new?Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):733-734. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a6fcc9. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24084527 No abstract available.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ectopic pregnancy: United States, 1990–1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44:46–8.
-
- Mol F, Mol BW, Ankum WM, van der Veen F, Hajenius PJ. Current evidence on surgery, systemic methotrexate and expectant management in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:309–19.
-
- Jurkovic D, Wilkinson H. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BMJ 2011;342:d3397.
-
- Herbst RS, Fukuoka M, Baselga J. Gefitinib—a novel targeted approach to treating cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:956–65.
-
- Su AI, Cooke MP, Ching KA, Hakak Y, Walker JR, Wiltshire T, et al.. Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:4465–70.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
