Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e74836.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074836. eCollection 2013.

Public views on food addiction and obesity: implications for policy and treatment

Affiliations

Public views on food addiction and obesity: implications for policy and treatment

Natalia M Lee et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: According to their advocates, neurobiological explanations of overeating, or "food addiction", have the potential to impact public understanding and treatment of obesity. In this study, we examine the public's acceptance of the concept of food addiction as an explanation of overeating and assess its effects upon their attitudes toward obese persons and the treatment of obesity.

Methods and findings: We conducted an online survey of 479 adults from the US (n = 215) and Australia (n = 264). There was substantial support for the idea of food addiction, particularly among obese participants. Over half favoured treating obesity as a type of addiction. Psychotherapy was believed to be the most effective treatment and educational and support programs were the preferred policies to address food addiction. There was very little support for increasing taxes on obesogenic foods. Despite the strong support for seeing obesity as a form of addiction, respondents still saw obesity as primarily the result of personal choices and emphasized the need for individuals to take responsibility for their eating.

Conclusions: Our sample of the general public strongly supported the idea of obesity as a form of food addiction; but this did not translate into support of clinical and public health policies that experts believe are most likely to reduce the prevalence of obesity. The reasons for the apparent disjunction between support for food addiction and a strong emphasis on personal choice for weight warrant further examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Responses as to the main cause of obesity.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proportion of responses based on most common, most effective, and least effective treatments of obesity.

References

    1. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, et al. (2011) National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9·1 million participants. Lancet 377: 557–567. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gearhardt AN, Grilo CM, DiLeone RJ, Brownell KD, Potenza MN (2011) Can food be addictive? Public health and policy implications. Addiction 106: 1208–1212. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lustig RH, Schmidt LA, Brindis CD (2012) The toxic truth about sugar. Nature 482: 27–29. - PubMed
    1. Ziauddeen H, Farooqi IS, Fletcher PC (2012) Obesity and the brain: How convincing is the addiction model? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13: 279–286. - PubMed
    1. DiLeone RJ, Taylor JR, Picciotto MR (2012) The drive to eat: Comparisons and distinctions between mechanisms of food reward and drug addiction. Nature Neuroscience 15: 1330–1335. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms