A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy
- PMID: 24088091
- PMCID: PMC3954096
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214939
A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy
Erratum in
- N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 12;369(24):2364
Abstract
Background: Twin birth is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than singleton birth. It is unclear whether planned cesarean section results in a lower risk of adverse outcomes than planned vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy.
Methods: We randomly assigned women between 32 weeks 0 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation with twin pregnancy and with the first twin in the cephalic presentation to planned cesarean section or planned vaginal delivery with cesarean only if indicated. Elective delivery was planned between 37 weeks 5 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation. The primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity, with the fetus or infant as the unit of analysis for the statistical comparison.
Results: A total of 1398 women (2795 fetuses) were randomly assigned to planned cesarean delivery and 1406 women (2812 fetuses) to planned vaginal delivery. The rate of cesarean delivery was 90.7% in the planned-cesarean-delivery group and 43.8% in the planned-vaginal-delivery group. Women in the planned-cesarean-delivery group delivered earlier than did those in the planned-vaginal-delivery group (mean number of days from randomization to delivery, 12.4 vs. 13.3; P=0.04). There was no significant difference in the composite primary outcome between the planned-cesarean-delivery group and the planned-vaginal-delivery group (2.2% and 1.9%, respectively; odds ratio with planned cesarean delivery, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.74; P=0.49).
Conclusions: In twin pregnancy between 32 weeks 0 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation, with the first twin in the cephalic presentation, planned cesarean delivery did not significantly decrease or increase the risk of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity, as compared with planned vaginal delivery. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00187369; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN74420086.).
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures

Comment in
-
Delivering twins.N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1365-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1310744. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24088097 No abstract available.
-
Caesarean delivery for twin gestation at 32-38 weeks does not lead to improved clinical outcomes for neonates or mothers.Evid Based Med. 2014 Jun;19(3):119. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101655. Epub 2013 Dec 20. Evid Based Med. 2014. PMID: 24361755 No abstract available.
-
Planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 16;370(3):280. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1314560. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 24428474 No abstract available.
-
Planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 16;370(3):279. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1314560. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 24428475 No abstract available.
-
Planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 16;370(3):279-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1314560. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 24428476 No abstract available.
-
[Vaginal delivery safe for twins starting at 32 weeks?].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7226; discussion A7226. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014. PMID: 24735810 Dutch.
-
Twin birth - planned vaginal delivery still standard of care.Acta Paediatr. 2017 Jun;106(6):1012. doi: 10.1111/apa.13728. Epub 2017 Jan 29. Acta Paediatr. 2017. PMID: 28133785 No abstract available.
References
-
- Wilcox LS, Kiely JL, Melvin CL, Martin MC. Assisted reproductive technologies: estimates of their contribution to multiple births and newborn hospital days in the United States. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:361–6. - PubMed
-
- Bergh T, Ericson A, Hillensjö T, Nygren KG, Wennerholm UB. Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982–95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;354:1579–85. - PubMed
-
- Ghai V, Vidyasagar D. Morbidity and mortality factors in twins: an epidemiologic approach. Clin Perinatol. 1988;15:123–40. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical