Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Dec;148(12):1116-22.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2750.

Massachusetts health care reform and reduced racial disparities in minimally invasive surgery

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Massachusetts health care reform and reduced racial disparities in minimally invasive surgery

Andrew P Loehrer et al. JAMA Surg. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Importance: Racial disparities in receipt of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) persist in the United States and have been shown to also be associated with a number of driving factors, including insurance status. However, little is known as to how expanding insurance coverage across a population influences disparities in surgical care.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of Massachusetts health care reform on racial disparities in MIS.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective cohort study assessed the probability of undergoing MIS vs an open operation for nonwhite patients in Massachusetts compared with 6 control states. All discharges (n = 167,560) of nonelderly white, black, or Latino patients with government insurance (Medicaid or Commonwealth Care insurance) or no insurance who underwent a procedure for acute appendicitis or acute cholecystitis at inpatient hospitals between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2009, were assessed. Data are from the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases.

Intervention: The 2006 Massachusetts health care reform, which expanded insurance coverage for government-subsidized, self-pay, and uninsured individuals in Massachusetts.

Main outcomes and measures: Adjusted probability of undergoing MIS and difference-in-difference estimates.

Results: Prior to the 2006 reform, Massachusetts nonwhite patients had a 5.21-percentage point lower probability of MIS relative to white patients (P < .001). Nonwhite patients in control states had a 1.39-percentage point lower probability of MIS (P = .007). After reform, nonwhite patients in Massachusetts had a 3.71-percentage point increase in the probability of MIS relative to concurrent trends in control states (P = .01). After 2006, measured racial disparities in MIS resolved in Massachusetts, with nonwhite patients having equal probability of MIS relative to white patients (0.06 percentage point greater; P = .96). However, nonwhite patients in control states without health care reform have a persistently lower probability of MIS relative to white patients (3.19 percentage points lower; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: The 2006 Massachusetts insurance expansion was associated with an increased probability of nonwhite patients undergoing MIS and resolution of measured racial disparities in MIS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Trend in Inpatient Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy for Uninsured and Government-Subsidized Patients The rate of procedures indicates the number of procedures captured divided by the total population with no insurance, Medicaid, or Commonwealth Care insurance coverage (in Massachusetts). The vertical dashed line indicates the 2006 Massachusetts health care reform.
None
Trends in Minimally Invasive Surgery A, Nonwhite patients. B, White patients. The vertical dashed lines indicate the 2006 Massachusetts health care reform.
None
Effect of Nonwhite Race/Ethnicity on the Probability of Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery. The percentage point difference in the probability of undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is between government-subsidized and self-pay nonwhite patients and government-subsidized and self-pay white patients, controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, hospital type, admission type, and complicated presentation. aP < .05. bP = .96.

References

    1. Lujan JA, Parrilla P, Robles R, Marin P, Torralba JA, Garcia-Ayllon J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: a prospective study. Arch Surg. 1998;133(2):173–175. - PubMed
    1. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186(5):545–553. - PubMed
    1. Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, et al. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1199–1208. - PubMed
    1. Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL. Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1993;217(3):233–236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenstein AJ, Moskowitz A, Gelijns AC, Egorova NN. Payer status and treatment paradigm for acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg. 2012;147(5):453–458. - PubMed

MeSH terms