Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;12(5):765-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.050. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

Evidence and recommendations for imaging liver fat in children, based on systematic review

Affiliations

Evidence and recommendations for imaging liver fat in children, based on systematic review

Hannah I Awai et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 May.

Abstract

Background & aims: Fatty liver is a common problem in children and increases their risk for cirrhosis, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Liver biopsy is the clinical standard for diagnosing and grading fatty liver. However, noninvasive imaging modalities are needed to assess liver fat in children. We performed a systematic review of studies that evaluated imaging liver fat in children.

Methods: We searched PubMed for original research articles in peer-reviewed journals from January 1, 1982, through December 31, 2012, using the key words "imaging liver fat." Studies included those in English, and those performed in children from birth to 18 years of age. To be eligible for inclusion, studies were required to measure hepatic steatosis via an imaging modality and a quantitative comparator as the reference standard.

Results: We analyzed 9 studies comprising 610 children; 4 studies assessed ultrasonography and 5 studies assessed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrasonography was used in the diagnosis of fatty liver with positive predictive values of 47% to 62%. There was not a consistent relationship between ultrasound steatosis score and the reference measurement of hepatic steatosis. Liver fat as measurements by MRI or by spectroscopy varied with the methodologies used. Liver fat measurements by MRI correlated with results from histologic analyses, but sample size did not allow for an assessment of diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions: Available evidence does not support the use of ultrasonography for the diagnosis or grading of fatty liver in children. Although MRI is a promising approach, the data are insufficient to make evidence-based recommendations regarding its use in children for the assessment of hepatic steatosis.

Keywords: Evidence-Based Medicine; Liver Imaging; NAFLD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures All authors must disclose any potential conflicts (financial, professional, or personal) that are relevant to the manuscript. If the author(s) has nothing to disclose, this must be stated.

Dr. Awai - nothing to disclose

Dr. Newton – nothing to disclose

Dr. Sirlin – research grant from GE

Dr. Behling – nothing to disclose

Dr. Schwimmer - nothing to disclose

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure shows the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria used for the structured review.

References

    1. Schwimmer JB, et al. Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1388–93. - PubMed
    1. Bohte AE, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(1):87–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee SS, et al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations. J Hepatol. 2010;52(4):579–85. - PubMed
    1. Mennesson N, et al. Liver steatosis quantification using magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective comparative study with liver biopsy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33(5):672–7. - PubMed
    1. Meisamy S, et al. Quantification of hepatic steatosis with T1-independent, T2-corrected MR imaging with spectral modeling of fat: blinded comparison with MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2011;258(3):767–75. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types