Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jun;114(6):881-888.
doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.040. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

Parent-administered exposure to increase children's vegetable acceptance: a randomized controlled trial

Randomized Controlled Trial

Parent-administered exposure to increase children's vegetable acceptance: a randomized controlled trial

Alison Fildes et al. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Repeated taste exposure, in combination with small rewards, has been shown to increase children's acceptance of disliked foods. However, previous studies have used direct contact with researchers or professionals for the implementation of the repeated exposure procedure. If mailed taste exposure instructions to parents produced comparable outcomes, this could be a cost-effective and easily disseminable strategy to promote healthier diets in children.

Objective: Our randomized controlled study aimed to test the efficacy and acceptability of mailed materials giving instructions on taste exposure as a means of increasing acceptance of vegetables in preschool-aged children.

Design: Participants were families of 3-year-old twins from the Gemini cohort who took part between March 2011 and April 2012. Families were randomized to a mailed intervention or a no treatment control condition. The intervention involved offering each child 14 daily tastes of a disliked (target) vegetable with a small reward (a sticker) if the child complied.

Main outcome measures: Outcomes were the child's intake of the target vegetable (number of pieces) and parent reports of the child's liking at two baseline (T1 and T2) and one postintervention (T3) behavior assessment.

Results: Record sheets with intake and liking data from T1, T2, and T3 were returned for 472 children, of which 442 were complete (94%). Over the intervention period (T2 to T3) intake and liking of the target vegetable increased significantly more in the intervention group than in the control group (intake: odds ratio 12.05, 95% CI 8.05 to 18.03, P<0.001; liking: odds ratio 12.34, CI 7.97 to 19.12, P<0.001). Acceptability of the procedure was very high among parents who completed the protocol.

Conclusions: Mailed instructions for taste exposure were effective in increasing children's acceptance of an initially disliked vegetable. These results support the value of parent-administered exposure to increase children's vegetable acceptance, and suggest that it can be carried out without direct health professional contact.

Keywords: Children; Exposure; Food preferences; Vegetables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through the trial to test the efficacy and acceptability of mailed materials giving instructions on taste exposure as a means of increasing acceptance of vegetables in preschool-aged children. aValues shown are number of families [number of children]. bDid not return test sheets. cWithdrew due to the children having no issues with eating vegetables, other priorities, or failed to provide a reason. dTest sheets were completed incorrectly resulting in exclusion from the analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean±standard error of the mean intakes of the target vegetables in the intervention and control groups based on continuous data. Intake (or liking) change scores were calculated using the full range of scores. (A) During the rest phase, intake change scores did not differ between groups (intervention: mean change 0.32±3.36, control: mean change 0.60±3.90; t=–0.80; P=0.43). During the experiment phase the intervention group had significantly higher intake change scores (intervention: mean change 4.07±7.52, control: mean change 0.61±4.35; t=6.06; P<0.001) than the control group. (B) During the rest phase liking change scores did not differ between groups (intervention: mean change 0.39±1.61, control: mean change 0.27±1.89; t=0.68; P=0.49). During the experiment phase the intervention group had significantly higher liking change scores (intervention: mean change 2.81±2.50, control: mean change 0.31±1.36; t=13.41; P<0.001) than the control group.

References

    1. Cooke L.J., Wardle J. Age and gender differences in children's food preferences. Br J Nutr. 2005;93(5):741–746. - PubMed
    1. Skinner J.D., Carruth B.R., Wendy B., Ziegler P.J. Children's food preferences: A longitudinal analysis. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(11):1638–1647. - PubMed
    1. Lock K., Pomerleau J., Causer L. The global burden of disease attributable to low consumption of fruit and vegetables: Implications for the global strategy on diet. Bull World Health Org. 2005;83(2):100–108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yngve A., Wolf A., Poortvliet E. Fruit and vegetable intake in a sample of 11-year-old children in 9 European countries: The Pro Children Cross-sectional Survey. Ann Nutr Metab. 2005;49(4):236–245. - PubMed
    1. Government UK Department of Health. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Headline results from Years 1 and 2 (combined) of the rolling programme 2008/9 - 2009/10. 2012. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/Publicati.... Accessed November 23, 2012.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data