Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 18:6:787-98.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S45156. eCollection 2013.

The impact of patients' chronic disease on family quality of life: an experience from 26 specialties

Affiliations

The impact of patients' chronic disease on family quality of life: an experience from 26 specialties

Catherine Jane Golics et al. Int J Gen Med. .

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have assessed family quality of life in individual disease areas and specialties. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of disease on family members of patients over a wide range of specialties and identify key impact areas. This information is essential in order to reveal the extent of this impact and to allow strategies to be developed to support the family members of patients with chronic disease.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 133 family members of mostly chronically ill patients from 26 medical specialties. Family members were invited to discuss all areas of their lives that had been affected by having an unwell relative. Thematic analysis was carried out using NVivo9® software.

Results: Most family members were female (61%), the partner or spouse of the patient (56%), or the parent (22%). Their mean age was 56.1 years (range: 21-85 years) and the mean duration of the patient's disease was 8.9 years (range: 1 month to 60 years). Ten key themes of family quality of life were identified from interviews. The median number of themes reported by family members was six (range: 1-10). The key themes included: emotional impact (mentioned by 92% of subjects), daily activities (91%), family relationships (69%), sleep and health (67%), holidays (62%), involvement in medical care and support given to family members (61%), work and study (52%), financial impact (51%), social life (37%), and time planning (14%). Relationships between the themes were identified.

Conclusion: This large scale multi-specialty study has demonstrated the significant, yet similar, impact that illness can have on the quality of life of patients' family members. Family quality of life is a previously neglected area of health care which needs to be addressed in order to provide appropriate support for the patient and the family unit.

Keywords: emotional impact; family activities; financial impact; greater patient; secondary impact of disease; social impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram describing the analytical process. Notes: NVivo9® qualitative data analysis software (QRS international, Doncaster, Australia).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The ten themes identified in the study and the percentage of family members affected by each.

References

    1. Basra MKA, Finlay AY. The family impact of skin diseases: the Greater Patient concept. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(5):929–937. - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(8):622–629. - PubMed
    1. Poston D, Turnbull A, Park J, Mannan H, Marquis J, Wang M. Family quality of life: a qualitative inquiry. Ment Retard. 2003;41(5):313–328. - PubMed
    1. Swanberg JE. Making it work: informal caregiving, cancer, and employment. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24(3):1–18. - PubMed
    1. Kornblith AB, Herr HW, Ofman US, Scher HI, Holland JC. Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. The value of a data base in clinical care. Cancer. 1994;73(11):2791–2802. - PubMed