Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;94(1):76-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening

Jennifer Elston Lafata  1 , Greg Cooper  2 , George Divine  3 , Nancy Oja-Tebbe  3 , Susan A Flocke  2
Affiliations

Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening

Jennifer Elston Lafata et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends using the 5As (i.e., Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist and Arrange) when discussing preventive services. We evaluate the association of the 5As discussion during primary care office visits with patients' subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use.

Methods: Audio-recordings of n=443 periodic health exams among insured patients aged 50-80 years and due for CRC screening were joined with pre-visit patient surveys and screening use data from an electronic medical record. Association of the 5As with CRC screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations.

Results: 93% of patients received a recommendation for screening (Advise) and 53% were screened in the following year. The likelihood of screening increased as the number of 5A steps increased: compared to patients whose visit contained no 5A step, those whose visit contained 1-2 steps (OR=2.96 [95% CI 1.16, 7.53]) and 3 or more steps (4.98 [95% CI 1.84, 13.44]) were significantly more likely to use screening.

Conclusions: Physician CRC screening recommendations that include recommended 5A steps are associated with increased patient adherence.

Practice implications: A CRC screening recommendation (Advise) that also describes patient eligibility (Assess) and provides help to obtain screening (Assist) may lead to improved adherence to CRC screening.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer screening; Decision making; Patient–physician communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Oct 1;89(19):1406–22. - PubMed
    1. Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, Breen N, Seeff LC, Brown ML. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):939–44. - PubMed
    1. Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, Duncan RP, Egede LE, Friedman LS, et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):663–7. 2010. - PubMed
    1. Street RLJ, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295–301. 2009. - PubMed
    1. Elston Lafata J, Divine G, Moon C, Williams K. Patient-Physician Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions and Screening Use. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Sep;31(3):202–9. 2006. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources