Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Nov;57(6):546-52.
doi: 10.1007/s10384-013-0276-2. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

Discrepancy between optic disc and nerve fiber layer assessment and optical coherence tomography in detecting glaucomatous progression

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Discrepancy between optic disc and nerve fiber layer assessment and optical coherence tomography in detecting glaucomatous progression

Jong Rak Lee et al. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optic disc/retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) photographic assessment in detecting glaucomatous progression.

Methods: Two-hundred twenty-six eyes of 130 glaucoma patients (mean follow-up: 2.5 years) with at least 5 OCT examinations were included. Eyes were classified into one of four groups (diffuse RNFL defect; localized RNFL defect; no RNFL defect; unidentifiable RNFL status) based on baseline RNFL photographs. After performing the entire series of optic disc/RNFL photographic assessments, the eyes were classified into one of three groups: stable, progressed, and undetermined. Progression was divided into one of four categories (optic disc rim thinning; widening RNFL defect; deepening RNFL defect; new disc hemorrhage). OCT progression was determined using guided progression analysis (GPA) software.

Results: One-hundred thirty-nine eyes had diffuse RNFL defects, 34 eyes had localized RNFL defects, 42 eyes had no RNFL defects, and 11 eyes had unidentifiable RNFL at baseline. Forty-six eyes showed at least one category of progression upon expert assessment of optic disc/RNFL photographs, while OCT GPA detected progression in 35 eyes. Among the 34 eyes in which progression was observed in photographs only, 15 showed a new disc hemorrhage, 12 presented deepening of an RNFL defect, 10 showed optic disc rim change, and 6 had widening of an RNFL defect. Among the 23 eyes processed only by OCT GPA, 18 had a diffuse RNFL defect at baseline.

Conclusion: OCT GPA was more sensitive in eyes with a diffuse RNFL defect whereas photographic assessment was better for detecting optic disc hemorrhage and deepening of an RNFL defect when evaluating structural progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Feb;50(2):662-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 May;128(5):560-8 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 2000 Jul;107(7):1309-15 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jun 20;53(7):3817-26 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 2010 Oct;117(10):1946-52 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources