Spatial and temporal assessment of pollen- and seed-mediated gene flow from genetically engineered plum Prunus domestica
- PMID: 24098374
- PMCID: PMC3788040
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075291
Spatial and temporal assessment of pollen- and seed-mediated gene flow from genetically engineered plum Prunus domestica
Abstract
Pollen flow from a 0.46 ha plot of genetically engineered (GE) Prunus domestica located in West Virginia, USA was evaluated from 2000-2010. Sentinel plum trees were planted at distances ranging from 132 to 854 m from the center of the GE orchard. Plots of mixed plum varieties and seedlings were located at 384, 484 and 998 m from the GE plot. Bee hives (Apis mellifera) were dispersed between the GE plum plot and the pollen flow monitoring sites. Pollen-mediated gene flow from out of the GE plum plot to non-GE plums under the study conditions was low, only occurring at all in 4 of 11 years and then in only 0.31% of the 12,116 seeds analyzed. When it occurred, gene flow, calculated as the number of GUS positive embryos/total embryos sampled, ranged from 0.215% at 132 m from the center of the GE plum plot (28 m from the nearest GE plum tree) to 0.033-0.017% at longer distances (384-998 m). Based on the percentage of GUS positive seeds per individual sampled tree the range was 0.4% to 12%. Within the GE field plot, gene flow ranged from 4.9 to 39%. Gene flow was related to distance and environmental conditions. A single year sample from a sentinel plot 132 m from the center of the GE plot accounted for 65% of the total 11-year gene flow. Spatial modeling indicated that gene flow dramatically decreased at distances over 400 m from the GE plot. Air temperature and rainfall were, respectively, positively and negatively correlated with gene flow, reflecting the effects of weather conditions on insect pollinator activity. Seed-mediated gene flow was not detected. These results support the feasibility of coexistence of GE and non-GE plum orchards.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



References
-
- Raybould AF, Gray AJ (1993) Genetically modified cross and hybridization with wild relatives: A UK perspective. J Appl Ecology 30: 199–219.
-
- Eastman K, Sweet J (2002) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. Environmental Issue Report No. 28 Gee, D. Project manager. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.
-
- Stewart Jr CN, Halfhill MD, Warwick SI (2003) Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 806–817. - PubMed
-
- Armstrong TT, Fitzjohn RG, Newstrom LE, Wilton AD, Lee WG (2005) Transgene escape: what potential for crop-wild hybridization? Mol Ecology 14: 2111–2132. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources