Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;28(9 Suppl):176-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.036.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables near normal gait at higher speeds, unlike total knee arthroplasty

Affiliations

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables near normal gait at higher speeds, unlike total knee arthroplasty

Anatole V Wiik et al. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Top walking speed (TWS) was used to compare UKA with TKA. Two groups of 23 patients, well matched for age, gender, height and weight and radiological severity were recruited based on high functional scores, more than twelve months post UKA or TKA. These were compared with 14 preop patients and 14 normal controls. Their gait was measured at increasing speeds on a treadmill instrumented with force plates. Both arthroplasty groups were significantly faster than the preop OA group. TKA patients walked substantially faster than any previously reported series of knee arthroplasties. UKA patients walked 10% faster than TKA, although not as fast as the normal controls. Stride length was 5% greater and stance time 7% shorter following UKA - both much closer to normal than TKA. Unlike TKA, UKA enables a near normal gait one year after surgery.

Keywords: gait; stride length; total knee arthroplasty; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; walking speed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig
Fig
A graph of the mean Normalised Body Weight at Top Walking Speed, against the mean Normalised Stance Time for TKA (N = 21), UKA (N = 22), and the healthy control group (N = 14).

References

    1. Robertsson O., Borgquist L., Knutson K. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70(2):170. - PubMed
    1. Willis-Owen C.A., Brust K., Alsop H. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee. 2009;16(6):473. - PubMed
    1. Argenson JN, Blanc G, Aubaniac JM, Parratte S. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. May 15;95(10):905–9. - PubMed
    1. Newman J., Pydisetty R.V., Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(1):52. - PubMed
    1. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, Murray DW. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Dec;92(12):1628–31. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources