Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;57(12):6236-45.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01578-13. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

In vitro phenotypic characterization of hepatitis C virus NS3 protease variants observed in clinical studies of telaprevir

Affiliations

In vitro phenotypic characterization of hepatitis C virus NS3 protease variants observed in clinical studies of telaprevir

Min Jiang et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Telaprevir is a linear, peptidomimetic small molecule that inhibits hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication by specifically inhibiting the NS3·4A protease. In phase 3 clinical studies, telaprevir in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin (PR) significantly improved sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in genotype 1 chronic HCV-infected patients compared with PR alone. In patients who do not achieve SVR after treatment with telaprevir-based regimens, variants with mutations in the NS3·4A protease region have been observed. Such variants can contribute to drug resistance and limit the efficacy of treatment. To gain a better understanding of the viral resistance profile, we conducted phenotypic characterization of the variants using HCV replicons carrying site-directed mutations. The most frequently observed (significantly enriched) telaprevir-resistant variants, V36A/M, T54A/S, R155K/T, and A156S, conferred lower-level resistance (3- to 25-fold), whereas A156T and V36M+R155K conferred higher-level resistance (>25-fold) to telaprevir. Rarely observed (not significantly enriched) variants included V36I/L and I132V, which did not confer resistance to telaprevir; V36C/G, R155G/I/M/S, V36A+T54A, V36L+R155K, T54S+R155K, and R155T+D168N, which conferred lower-level resistance to telaprevir; and A156F/N/V, V36A+R155K/T, V36M+R155T, V36A/M+A156T, T54A+A156S, T54S+A156S/T, and V36M+T54S+R155K, which conferred higher-level resistance to telaprevir. All telaprevir-resistant variants remained fully sensitive to alpha interferon, ribavirin, and HCV NS5B nucleoside and nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitors. In general, the replication capacity of telaprevir-resistant variants was lower than that of the wild-type replicon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Comparison of the activities of HCV NS3 protease inhibitors on NS3 variant replicons. Fold change in EC50 was determined in the G1b 48-h assay.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Comparison of fold change of replicon EC50 and enzyme IC50 of NS3 protease inhibitors against NS3 variants. The fold change of replicon EC50 was determined in the G1b 48-h assay. Data for WT (n = 4) and NS3 variants with actual or estimated values (n = 20) (V36L/M, R155I/K/S/T, A156S, and V36M+R155K for telaprevir; V36M, R155K, A156T, and V36M+R155K for boceprevir; V36M, R155I/T, and A156S for ciluprevir; and V36M, R155K, A156T, and V36M+R155K for danoprevir) were included in the comparison. A linear regression was performed on a log-transformed scale, with the resulting coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.66 having a P value < 0.0001.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Telaprevir EC50 fold change and in vitro replicative fitness of NS3 variants in G1b replicon cells. The fold change in mean EC50 and the SD were derived from Table 1 and plotted in the black bars corresponding to the y axis on the left. The replicative fitness (replication capacity) and the SD were derived from Table 5 and plotted in the gray bars corresponding to the y axis on the right. The upper dashed line represents the maximum change in EC50 (i.e., 93-fold) that could be detected in the 96-h EC50 assay. The lower dashed line represents the maximum change in EC50 (i.e., 62-fold) that could be detected in the 48-h EC50 assay. The fold changes in EC50 above the maximum detection limits are represented with the “>” sign.

References

    1. Alter HJ, Seeff LB. 2000. Recovery, persistence, and sequelae in hepatitis C virus infection: a perspective on long-term outcome. Semin. Liver Dis. 20:17–35 - PubMed
    1. Ghobrial RM, Steadman R, Gornbein J, Lassman C, Holt CD, Chen P, Farmer DG, Yersiz H, Danino N, Collisson E, Baquarizo A, Han SS, Saab S, Goldstein LI, Donovan JA, Esrason K, Busuttil RW. 2001. A 10-year experience of liver transplantation for hepatitis C: analysis of factors determining outcome in over 500 patients. Ann. Surg. 234:384–393 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kenny-Walsh E. 2001. The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection. Clin. Liver Dis. 5:969–977 - PubMed
    1. Purcell RH. 1994. Hepatitis C virus: historical perspective and current concepts. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 14:181–191 - PubMed
    1. Wasley A, Alter MJ. 2000. Epidemiology of hepatitis C: geographic differences and temporal trends. Semin. Liver Dis. 20:1–16 - PubMed

Publication types