Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 1:4:309.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00309. eCollection 2013.

Activation of the Interferon Pathway is Dependent Upon Autoantibodies in African-American SLE Patients, but Not in European-American SLE Patients

Affiliations

Activation of the Interferon Pathway is Dependent Upon Autoantibodies in African-American SLE Patients, but Not in European-American SLE Patients

Kichul Ko et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antibodies directed at RNA-binding proteins (anti-RBP) are associated with high serum type I interferon (IFN), which plays an important role in SLE pathogenesis. African-Americans (AA) are more likely to develop SLE, and SLE is also more severe in this population. We hypothesized that peripheral blood gene expression patterns would differ between AA and European-American (EA) SLE patients, and between those with anti-RBP antibodies and those who lack these antibodies.

Methods: Whole blood RNA from 33 female SLE patients and 16 matched female controls from AA and EA ancestral backgrounds was analyzed on Affymetrix Gene 1.0 ST gene expression arrays. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used to compare the top differentially expressed canonical pathways amongst the sample groups. An independent cohort of 116 SLE patients was used to replicate findings using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

Results: Both AA and EA patients with positive anti-RBP antibodies showed over-expression of similar IFN-related canonical pathways, such as IFN Signaling (P = 1.3 × 10(-7) and 6.3 × 10(-11) in AA vs. EA respectively), Antigen Presenting Pathway (P = 1.8 × 10(-5) and 2.5 × 10(-6)), and a number of pattern recognition receptor pathways. In anti-RBP negative (RBP-) patients, EA subjects demonstrated similar IFN-related pathway activation, whereas no IFN-related pathways were detected in RBP-AA patients. qPCR validation confirmed similar results.

Conclusion: Our data show that IFN-induced gene expression is completely dependent on the presence of autoantibodies in AA SLE patients but not in EA patients. This molecular heterogeneity suggests differences in IFN-pathway activation between ancestral backgrounds in SLE. This heterogeneity may be clinically important, as therapeutics targeting this pathway are being developed.

Keywords: ancestral background; autoantibodies; interferon alpha; interferon gamma; systemic lupus erythematosus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pathway diagram illustrating the type I and type II IFN pathways in SLE patient subsets. Genes which are up-regulated are shaded red, with increasingly dark red shading indicating a greater degree of over-expression in cases as compared to controls of the same ancestral background. AA, African-American; EA, European-American; RBP+, anti-RNA-binding-protein (RBP) antibody positive; and RBP−, RBP antibody negative. Pictures generated using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Type I IFN-induced gene expression in SLE patient subgroups and controls. Expression of three genes (IFIT1, MX1, and PKR) are shown in both patients with anti-RNA-binding protein antibodies (RBP+), and those who lack those antibodies (RBP−). Central tendency shown is a median, with error bars representing the interquartile range. P values generated by Mann–Whitney U test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Type I IFN-induced gene expression in RBP–SLE patient subgroups and controls in regards to of anti-dsDNA antibodies. Expression of three genes (IFIT1, MX1, and PKR) are shown in both patients with anti-dsDNA antibodies (DNA+), and those who lack those antibodies (DNA−). Central tendency shown is a median, with error bars representing the interquartile range. P values generated by Mann–Whitney U test.

References

    1. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum (1997) 40:1725.10.1002/art.1780400928 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alarcon-Segovia D, Alarcon-Riquelme ME, Cardiel MH, Caeiro F, Massardo L, Villa AR, et al. Familial aggregation of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and other autoimmune diseases in 1,177 lupus patients from the GLADEL cohort. Arthritis Rheum (2005) 52:1138–4710.1002/art.20999 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhodes B, Vyse TJ. The genetics of SLE: an update in the light of genome-wide association studies. Rheumatology (Oxford) (2008) 47:1603.10.1093/rheumatology/ken247 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsokos GC. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med (2011) 365:2110–2110.1056/NEJMra1100359 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weckerle CE, Niewold TB. The unexplained female predominance of systemic lupus erythematosus: clues from genetic and cytokine studies. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol (2011) 40:42–910.1007/s12016-009-8192-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed