Association of third-trimester abdominal circumference with provider-initiated preterm delivery
- PMID: 24102316
- PMCID: PMC4895191
- DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.852171
Association of third-trimester abdominal circumference with provider-initiated preterm delivery
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the association of a small third-trimester abdominal circumference (AC < 10th percentile) in the setting of a normal estimated fetal weight (EFW ≥ 10th percentile) with gestational age at delivery, indication for delivery and neonatal outcomes.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study at an academic hospital of women with singleton pregnancy seen for ultrasound from 28+0-33+6 weeks of gestation during 2009-2011. Outcomes were compared between two groups: normal AC (AC and EFW ≥ 10th percentile) and small AC (AC < 10th percentile and EFW ≥ 10th percentile).
Results: Among 592 pregnancies, fetuses in the small AC group (n = 55) experienced a higher incidence of overall preterm delivery (RR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.3-3.7) and provider-initiated preterm delivery (RR: 3.7, CI: 1.8-7.5) compared to those in the normal AC group (n = 537). Neonates in the small AC group had a lower median birth weight whether delivered at term (p < 0.001) or preterm (p = 0.04), but were not more likely to experience intensive care unit admission or respiratory distress syndrome (all p ≥ 0.35).
Conclusions: Small AC, even in the setting of an EFW ≥ 10th percentile, was associated with a higher incidence of overall and provider-initiated preterm delivery despite similar neonatal outcomes. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether these preterm deliveries could be prevented.
Keywords: Abdominal circumference; fetal surveillance; obstetrics; preterm delivery; third-trimester ultrasound.
Conflict of interest statement
The other authors report no declarations of interest.
References
-
- Ariyuki Y, Hata T, Kitao M. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods. Pediatrics. 1995;96:36–42. - PubMed
-
- Figueras F, Gardosi J. Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:288–300. - PubMed
-
- Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Pilalis A, et al. Performance of third-trimester ultrasound for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates and evaluation of contingency screening policies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:535–42. - PubMed
-
- Skovron ML, Berkowitz GS, Lapinski RH, et al. Evaluation of early third-trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth retardation. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10:153–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical