Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar;175(3):397-407.
doi: 10.1111/cei.12206.

Requirement for safety monitoring for approved multiple sclerosis therapies: an overview

Affiliations
Review

Requirement for safety monitoring for approved multiple sclerosis therapies: an overview

P S Rommer et al. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

During the last two decades, treatment options for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have broadened tremendously. All agents that are currently approved for clinical use have potential side effects, and a careful risk-benefit evaluation is part of a decision algorithm to identify the optimal treatment choice for an individual patient. Whereas glatiramer acetate and interferon beta preparations have been used in MS for decades and have a proven safety record, more recently approved drugs appear to be more effective, but potential risks might be more severe. The potential complications of some novel therapies might not even have been identified to their full extent. This review is aimed at the clinical neurologist in that it offers insights into potential adverse events of each of the approved MS therapeutics: interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, fingolimod and teriflunomide, as well as recently approved therapeutics such as dimethyl fumarate and alemtuzumab. It also provides recommendations for monitoring the different drugs during therapy in order to avoid common side effects.

Keywords: activation; acute respiratory distress syndrome; multiple sclerosis (MS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weinshenker BG. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: update 1998. Semin Neurol. 1998;18:301–307. - PubMed
    1. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology. 1996;46:907–911. - PubMed
    1. Frischer JM, Bramow S, Dal-Bianco A, et al. The relation between inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis brains. Brain. 2009;132:1175–1189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenberg BM, Khatri BO, Kramer JF. Current and emerging multiple sclerosis theraupeutics. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2010;16:58–77. - PubMed
    1. Winkelmann A, Loebermann M, Reisinger EC, Zettl UK. Multiple sclerosis treatment and infectious issues: update 2013. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;175:425–438. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances