Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct;12(5):473-9.
doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60075-2.

Risk assessment in patients undergoing liver resection

Affiliations
Review

Risk assessment in patients undergoing liver resection

De-Cai Yu et al. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Liver resection is still a risky procedure with high morbidity and mortality. It is significant to predict the morbidity and mortality with some models after liver resection.

Data sources: The MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the terms "hepatectomy" and "risk assessment" for relevant studies before August 2012. Papers published in English were included.

Results: Thirty-four original papers were included finally. Some models, such as MELD, APACHE II, E-PASS, or POSSUM, widely used in other populations, are useful to predict the morbidity and mortality after liver resection. Some special models for liver resection are used to predict outcomes after liver resection, such as mortality, liver dysfunction, transfusion, or acute renal failure. However, there is no good scoring system to predict or classify surgical complications because of shortage of internal or external validation.

Conclusion: It is important to validate the models for the major complications after liver resection with further internal or external databases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources