Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study
- PMID: 24105705
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.13210
Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether head-perineum distance (HPD) measured by transperineal ultrasound is predictive of vaginal delivery and time remaining in labor in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labor and to compare the predictive value with that of angle of progression (AoP).
Methods: This was a prospective observational study at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK from January 2012 to April 2013, of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation at term with prolonged first stage of labor. We used transperineal ultrasound to measure HPD (shortest distance between the outer bony limit of the fetal skull and the perineum) and AoP (angle between a line through the long axis of the symphysis and the tangent to the fetal head) and transabdominal ultrasound to classify fetal head position. The main outcomes were vaginal delivery and time remaining in labor.
Results: Of 150 women enrolled, 39 underwent delivery by Cesarean section. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for the prediction of vaginal delivery was 81% (95% CI, 73-89%) using HPD as the test variable and 72% (95% CI, 63-82%) using AoP. HPD was ≤ 40 mm in 84 (56%) women, of whom 77 (92%; 95% CI, 84-96%) delivered vaginally. HPD was > 40 mm in the other 66 (44%) women, of whom 34 (52%; 95% CI, 40-63%) delivered vaginally. AoP was ≥ 110° in 84 of the 145 (58%) in whom this was available and, of these, 74 (88%; 95% CI, 79-93%) delivered vaginally. AoP was < 110° in the other 61 (42%) women, of whom 35 (57%; 95% CI, 45-69%) delivered vaginally. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that HPD ≤ 40 mm (odds ratio (OR), 4.92; 95% CI, 1.54-15.80), AoP ≥ 110° (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.01-9.56), non-occiput posterior position (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.24-9.12) and spontaneous onset of labor (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.42-13.89) were independent predictors for vaginal delivery. Both ultrasound methods were predictive for the time remaining in labor.
Conclusion: Transperineal ultrasound measurement of HPD and AoP provide important information about the likelihood of vaginal delivery and the time remaining in labor in nulliparous women with prolonged labor.
Keywords: Cesarean section; angle of progression; head-perineum distance; occiput posterior position.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;37(6):702-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.8951. Epub 2011 May 3. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21308837
-
Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):642.e1-642.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.045. Epub 2019 Oct 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31589867
-
Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;32(2):199-204. doi: 10.1002/uog.5360. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18528923
-
Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;226(2):205-214.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.031. Epub 2021 Aug 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34384775
-
2D-transperineal ultrasound in delivery room: Contribution in assessing labor progress, predicting outcome of labor and recognizing obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). A systematic review.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025 Mar;54(3):102910. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102910. Epub 2025 Jan 13. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025. PMID: 39814335
Cited by
-
Benefits and pitfalls of the use of intrapartum ultrasound.Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2015 May;18(2):53-59. doi: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00042.x. Epub 2015 Dec 31. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2015. PMID: 28191241 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Intrapartum sonography - eccentricity or necessity?J Ultrason. 2015 Jun;15(61):125-36. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2015.0011. Epub 2015 Jun 30. J Ultrason. 2015. PMID: 26675398 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 24;15:273. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0704-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015. PMID: 26496894 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound. 2016 Nov;24(4):222-232. doi: 10.1177/1742271X16673124. Epub 2016 Oct 6. Ultrasound. 2016. PMID: 27847537 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dynamic Changes in the Myometrium during the Third Stage of Labor, Evaluated Using Two-Dimensional Ultrasound, in Women with Normal and Abnormal Third Stage of Labor and in Women with Obstetric Complications.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;80(1):26-37. doi: 10.1159/000370001. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015. PMID: 25634647 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous