Modeling the glucose sensor error
- PMID: 24108706
- DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2284023
Modeling the glucose sensor error
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors are portable devices, employed in the treatment of diabetes, able to measure glucose concentration in the interstitium almost continuously for several days. However, CGM sensors are not as accurate as standard blood glucose (BG) meters. Studies comparing CGM versus BG demonstrated that CGM is affected by distortion due to diffusion processes and by time-varying systematic under/overestimations due to calibrations and sensor drifts. In addition, measurement noise is also present in CGM data. A reliable model of the different components of CGM inaccuracy with respect to BG (briefly, "sensor error") is important in several applications, e.g., design of optimal digital filters for denoising of CGM data, real-time glucose prediction, insulin dosing, and artificial pancreas control algorithms. The aim of this paper is to propose an approach to describe CGM sensor error by exploiting n multiple simultaneous CGM recordings. The model of sensor error description includes a model of blood-to-interstitial glucose diffusion process, a linear time-varying model to account for calibration and sensor drift-in-time, and an autoregressive model to describe the additive measurement noise. Model orders and parameters are identified from the n simultaneous CGM sensor recordings and BG references. While the model is applicable to any CGM sensor, here, it is used on a database of 36 datasets of type 1 diabetic adults in which n = 4 Dexcom SEVEN Plus CGM time series and frequent BG references were available simultaneously. Results demonstrates that multiple simultaneous sensor data and proper modeling allow dissecting the sensor error into its different components, distinguishing those related to physiology from those related to technology.
Similar articles
-
Model of glucose sensor error components: identification and assessment for new Dexcom G4 generation devices.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Dec;53(12):1259-69. doi: 10.1007/s11517-014-1226-y. Epub 2014 Nov 23. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015. PMID: 25416850
-
Modeling the error of factory-calibrated continuous glucose monitoring sensors: application to Dexcom G6 sensor data.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:750-753. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856790. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019. PMID: 31946005
-
Improving accuracy and precision of glucose sensor profiles: retrospective fitting by constrained deconvolution.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 Apr;61(4):1044-53. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2293531. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014. PMID: 24658229
-
Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Feb;(170):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02582.x. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011. PMID: 21323816 Review.
-
Continuous glucose monitoring with glucose sensors: calibration and assessment criteria.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5(4):572-86. doi: 10.1089/152091503322250596. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003. PMID: 14511412 Review.
Cited by
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Past, Present and Future Algorithmic Challenges.Sensors (Basel). 2016 Dec 9;16(12):2093. doi: 10.3390/s16122093. Sensors (Basel). 2016. PMID: 27941663 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Model of glucose sensor error components: identification and assessment for new Dexcom G4 generation devices.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Dec;53(12):1259-69. doi: 10.1007/s11517-014-1226-y. Epub 2014 Nov 23. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015. PMID: 25416850
-
Clinical Impact of Blood Glucose Monitoring Accuracy: An In-Silico Study.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1187-1195. doi: 10.1177/1932296817710474. Epub 2017 Jun 1. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017. PMID: 28569076 Free PMC article.
-
Limits to the Evaluation of the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems by Clinical Trials.Biosensors (Basel). 2018 May 18;8(2):50. doi: 10.3390/bios8020050. Biosensors (Basel). 2018. PMID: 29783669 Free PMC article.
-
Mobile technology and the digitization of healthcare.Eur Heart J. 2016 May 7;37(18):1428-38. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv770. Epub 2016 Feb 11. Eur Heart J. 2016. PMID: 26873093 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical