Racial and socioeconomic disparities in the allocation of expanded criteria donor kidneys
- PMID: 24115196
- PMCID: PMC3848390
- DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01430213
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in the allocation of expanded criteria donor kidneys
Abstract
Background and objectives: In carefully selected individuals, receiving expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys confer a survival advantage over remaining on dialysis. However, wait lists for ECD kidneys often include a significant proportion of young patients, who have no predictable survival benefit from ECD kidneys. This study hypothesized that educational and socioeconomic factors might influence a younger patient's decision to accept an ECD kidney.
Design, setting, participants, & measurements: This study was a retrospective analysis of all first single-kidney transplants in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from 2000 to 2009 in patients aged 18-40 years and waitlisted <3 years. The primary outcome measured was the odds of receiving an ECD kidney compared with an standard criteria donor kidney in different demographic subgroups. Race, income, and education were analyzed in main-effect and two-way interaction models, corrected for candidate panel reactive antibodies and sex.
Results: Of 13,615 ECD transplants, 591 kidneys (4.3%) went to recipients aged between 18 and 40 years who were waitlisted <3 years. African Americans (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 2.33) or those with low education (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 3.89) were more likely to receive an ECD kidney than Caucasians or those with a college degree, respectively. However, African Americans with higher education levels did not have significantly higher odds of receiving an ECD kidney than Caucasians with a college degree.
Conclusions: In patients aged <40 years and waitlisted <3 years, African Americans and those with lower educational status and low income are more likely to receive an ECD kidney than Caucasians or those with higher education. It is important that health care providers and patients understand such disparities to facilitate a more rational use of ECD kidneys.
Figures


References
-
- Ojo AO, Heinrichs D, Emond JC, McGowan JJ, Guidinger MK, Delmonico FL, Metzger RA: Organ donation and utilization in the USA. Am J Transplant 4[Suppl 9]: 27–37, 2004 - PubMed
-
- Langone AJ, Helderman JH: Disparity between solid-organ supply and demand. N Engl J Med 349: 704–706, 2003 - PubMed
-
- Delmonico FL, Sheehy E, Marks WH, Baliga P, McGowan JJ, Magee JC: Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 2004. Am J Transplant 5: 862–873, 2005 - PubMed
-
- Kauffman HM, Bennett LE, McBride MA, Ellison MD: The expanded donor. Transplant Rev 11: 165–190, 1997
-
- Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynn JJ, Merion RM: Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 3[Suppl 4]: 114–125, 2003 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical