Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1985;28(4):391-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF00544356.

Effect of ophthalmic administration of S-596 (Arotinolol) on intraocular pressure and haemodynamics in health volunteers: comparison with timolol

Clinical Trial

Effect of ophthalmic administration of S-596 (Arotinolol) on intraocular pressure and haemodynamics in health volunteers: comparison with timolol

M Nakashima et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1985.

Abstract

The effects on intraocular pressure (IOP) and haemodynamics of two beta-blockers, arotinolol and timolol, administered topically to the eye, were studied in 6 healthy volunteers in a cross-over trial. 0.5% timolol or 0.5% arotinolol ophthalmic solutions drop was instilled in both eyes of the volunteers at an interval of 48 hours. Timolol lowered IOP by about 31.9% 1 hour after administration and the effect continued until 3 h, whilst arotinolol lowered it significantly 2 h after instillation and the same maximum effect as that of timolol was obtained after 3 h. Arotinolol was detected in blood in all subject and timolol in blood in one subject, although it was found in all subjects in urine. Both drugs lowered heart rate at rest and attenuated the increase in the double product (products of blood pressure and heart rate) at exercise. The effect of timolol on the double products was larger. Thus, arotinolol and timolol decreased IOP to similar extent, although the maximal effect of arotinolol was delayed. Arotinolol as well as timolol affected haemodynamics through absorption into circulation, but the former had less effect on haemodynamics during exercise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977 Apr;95(4):605-7 - PubMed
    1. Ann Ophthalmol. 1982 Apr;14(4):364-5 - PubMed
    1. J Pharm Sci. 1978 Sep;67(9):1334-5 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1979 Mar 8;300(10):566 - PubMed
    1. Drug Metab Dispos. 1975 Sep-Oct;3(5):361-70 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources