Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;26(1):45-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 9.

A national audit of current cardiac device policies from radiotherapy centres across the UK

Affiliations
Free article

A national audit of current cardiac device policies from radiotherapy centres across the UK

J F Lester et al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Aims: The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators) undergoing radiotherapy treatment is increasing. The aims of this audit were to establish current UK practice regarding the management of patients with implanted cardiac devices undergoing radiotherapy and to compare this practice with current 'gold standard' evidence-based guidelines.

Materials and methods: All UK radiotherapy departments were contacted and asked to provide their current cardiac implantable electronic device policy or to indicate if there was no current policy. A proforma was created to analyse these policies and to compare with current best practice.

Results: In total, 47/67 (70%) radiotherapy departments responded and 45 departmental policies were submitted; 31/45 (69%) policies defined the radiotherapy tolerance dose to permanent pacemakers and 14/45 (31%) defined the monitoring procedure for patients in line with current best practice. Only 5/45 (11%) policies defined the radiotherapy tolerance dose to implantable cardioverter defibrillators and 12/45 (27%) defined the monitoring procedure in line with current best practice.

Conclusion: Most UK cardiac device policies do not reflect current best evidence. Policies are based on research carried out in 1994 by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This evidence does not account for advances in cardiac implantable electronic device technology. Further research is urgently needed to establish the effect of radiotherapy on these devices.

Keywords: Cardiac device; defibrillator; national survey; pacemaker; policy; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources