Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan-Feb;7(1):59-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

Rapid acquisition of the transcranial magnetic stimulation stimulus response curve

Affiliations

Rapid acquisition of the transcranial magnetic stimulation stimulus response curve

Jonathan P Mathias et al. Brain Stimul. 2014 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation is frequently used to construct stimulus response (SR) curves in studies of motor learning and rehabilitation. A drawback of the established method is the time required for data acquisition, which is frequently greater than a participant's ability to maintain attention. The technique is therefore difficult to use in the clinical setting.

Objective: To reduce the time of curve acquisition by determining the minimum acquisition time and number of stimuli required to acquire an SR curve.

Methods: SR curves were acquired from first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) at 6 interstimulus intervals (ISI) between 1.4 and 4 s in 12 participants. To determine if low-frequency rTMS might affect the SR curve, MEP amplitudes were monitored before and after 3 min of 1 Hz rTMS delivered at 120% of resting motor threshold in 12 participants. Finally, SR curves were acquired from FDI, ADM and Biceps Brachii (BB) in 12 participants, and the minimum number of stimuli was calculated using a sequential MEP elimination process.

Results: There were no significant differences between curves acquired with 1.4 s ISI and any other ISI. Low frequency rTMS did not significantly depress MEP amplitude (P = 0.87). On average, 61 ± 18 (FDI), 60 ± 16 (ADM) and 59 ± 16 (BB) MEPs were needed to construct a representative SR curve.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that reliable SR curves may be acquired in less than 2 min. At this rate, SR curves become a clinically feasible method for assessing corticospinal excitability in research and rehabilitation settings.

Keywords: Assessment; Corticospinal excitability; Neuroplasticity; rTMS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources