Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 11:4:736.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00736. eCollection 2013.

Detecting false intent using eye blink measures

Affiliations

Detecting false intent using eye blink measures

Frank M Marchak. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Eye blink measures have been shown to be diagnostic in detecting deception regarding past acts. Here we examined-across two experiments with increasing degrees of ecological validity-whether changes in eye blinking can be used to determine false intent regarding future actions. In both experiments, half of the participants engaged in a mock crime and then transported an explosive device with the intent of delivering it to a "contact" that would use it to cause a disturbance. Eye blinking was measured for all participants when presented with three types of questions: relevant to intent to transport an explosive device, relevant to intent to engage in an unrelated illegal act, and neutral questions. Experiment 1 involved standing participants watching a video interviewer with audio presented ambiently. Experiment 2 involved standing participants questioned by a live interviewer. Across both experiments, changes in blink count during and immediately following individual questions, total number of blinks, and maximum blink time length differentiated those with false intent from truthful intent participants. In response to questions relevant to intent to deliver an explosive device vs. questions relevant to intent to deliver illegal drugs, those with false intent showed a suppression of blinking during the questions when compared to the 10 s period after the end of the questions, a lower number of blinks, and shorter maximum blink duration. The results are discussed in relation to detecting deception about past activities as well as to the similarities and differences to detecting false intent as described by prospective memory and arousal.

Keywords: blink; credibility assessment; deception detection; false intent; oculometrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experiment 1—Blink count difference as the number of blinks in the period from the end of a question to 10 s after question end minus the number of blinks during the question presentation for false intent and truthful Intent participants. Error bars show Standard Error.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experiment 1—Number of blinks for false intent and truthful intent participants. Error bars show Standard Error.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experiment 1—Maximum blink duration for false intent and truthful intent participants. Error bars show Standard Error.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Experiment 2—Blink count difference as the number of blinks in the period from the end of a question to 10 s after question end minus the number of blinks during the question presentation for false intent and truthful intent participants. Error bars show Standard Error.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Experiment 2—Number of blinks for false intent and truthful intent participants. Error bars show Standard Error.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Experiment 2—Maximum blink duration for false intent and truthful intent participants. Error bars show Standard Error.

References

    1. Abrams S. (1989). The Complete Polygraph Handbook. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
    1. Aikins D. E., Martin D. J., Morgan C. A. I. (2010). Decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia in individuals with deceptive intent. Psychophysiology 47, 633–636 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00976.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clemens F., Granhag P. A., Strömwall L. A. (2011). Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing. Law Hum. Behav. 35, 512–522 10.1007/s10979-010-9258-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cook A. E., Hacker D. J., Webb A., Osher D., Kristjansson S. D., Woltz D. J., et al. (2012). Lyin' eyes: ocular-motor measures of reading reveal deception. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 18, 201–213 10.1037/a0028307 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cutrow R. J., Parks A., Lucas N., Thomas K. (1972). The objective use of multiple physiological indices in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology 9, 578–587 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1972.tb00767.x - DOI - PubMed