Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 9:4:158.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00158. eCollection 2013.

Long-Range Temporal Correlations, Multifractality, and the Causal Relation between Neural Inputs and Movements

Affiliations

Long-Range Temporal Correlations, Multifractality, and the Causal Relation between Neural Inputs and Movements

Jing Hu et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Understanding the causal relation between neural inputs and movements is very important for the success of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs). In this study, we analyze 104 neurons' firings using statistical, information theoretic, and fractal analysis. The latter include Fano factor analysis, multifractal adaptive fractal analysis (MF-AFA), and wavelet multifractal analysis. We find neuronal firings are highly non-stationary, and Fano factor analysis always indicates long-range correlations in neuronal firings, irrespective of whether those firings are correlated with movement trajectory or not, and thus does not reveal any actual correlations between neural inputs and movements. On the other hand, MF-AFA and wavelet multifractal analysis clearly indicate that when neuronal firings are not well correlated with movement trajectory, they do not have or only have weak temporal correlations. When neuronal firings are well correlated with movements, they are characterized by very strong temporal correlations, up to a time scale comparable to the average time between two successive reaching tasks. This suggests that neurons well correlated with hand trajectory experienced a "re-setting" effect at the start of each reaching task, in the sense that within the movement correlated neurons the spike trains' long-range dependences persisted about the length of time the monkey used to switch between task executions. A new task execution re-sets their activity, making them only weakly correlated with their prior activities on longer time scales. We further discuss the significance of the coalition of those important neurons in executing cortical control of prostheses.

Keywords: Fano factor; adaptive fluctuation analysis; brain-machine interface; neuronal firings; wavelet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) X, Y, Z components of the monkey’s hand movements. Dashed lines indicate time intervals when the monkey stretched its hand to grab food and subsequently place the food to its mouth. (B–F) Neuronal firings of five neurons associated with the hand movements plotted in (A).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Four types of neuron ISI distributions. (A) Exponential, (B) gamma, (C) log-normal, and (D) power-law. Plotted in (A–C) and (D) are probability density functions (pdfs) and complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF), respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time-varying correlations between spike counting data and hand movement data. (A) Correlation coefficient; (B) mutual information.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fano factor analysis of the spike count data of 6 neurons, where F(T) denotes the Fano factor. The slopes in the figure amount to 2H − 1. Note that visually, neurons (A–C) are not well correlated with hand movements, while neurons (D–F) are highly correlated with hand movements.
Figure 5
Figure 5
AFA of the same six neurons. Note that the slopes in the figure amounts to 2H. Also note that neurons (A–C) only have one scaling range, while neurons (D–F) have two scaling ranges.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Wavelet analysis of the same six neurons. Here, the slope equals H. Notice the consistency with AFA analysis.
Figure 7
Figure 7
MF-AFA of the “superimposed” spike train in the four brain areas, where (A) for area 1, left posterior parietal (PP); (B) area 2, left primary motor (MI); (C) area 3, left dorsal premotor (PMD); and (D) area 4, right primary motor and dorsal premotor (MI/PMD).
Figure 8
Figure 8
MF wavelet analysis of the “superimposed” spike train in the four brain areas, where (A) for area 1, left posterior parietal (PP); (B) area 2, left primary motor (MI); (C) area 3, left dorsal premotor (PMD); and (D) area 4, right primary motor and dorsal premotor (MI/PMD).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen RA, Musallam S, Pesaran B. Selecting the signals for a brain-machine interface. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2004) 14:720–610.1016/j.conb.2004.10.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donoghue JP. Bridging the brain to the world: a perspective on neural interface systems. Neuron (2008) 60:511–2110.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.037 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waldert S, Preissl H, Demandt E, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Aertsen A, et al. Hand movement direction decoded from MEG and EEG. J Neurosci (2008) 28:1000–810.1523/JNEUROSCI.5171-07.2008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schalk G, Kubanek J, Miller KJ, Anderson NR, Leuthardt EC, Ojemann JG, et al. Decoding two-dimensional movement trajectories using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J Neural Eng (2007) 4:264–7510.1088/1741-2560/4/3/012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stark E, Abeles M. Predicting movement from multiunit activity. J Neurosci (2007) 27:8387–9410.1523/JNEUROSCI.1321-07.2007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources