Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 16:14:294.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-294.

Chronic low back pain patient groups in primary care--a cross sectional cluster analysis

Affiliations

Chronic low back pain patient groups in primary care--a cross sectional cluster analysis

Annika Viniol et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Due to the heterogeneous nature of chronic low back pain (CLBP), it is necessary to identify patient groups and evaluate treatments within these groups. We aimed to identify groups of patients with CLBP in the primary care setting.

Methods: We performed a k-means cluster analysis on a large data set (n = 634) of primary care patients with CLBP. Variables of sociodemographic data, pain characteristics, psychological status (i.e., depression, anxiety, somatization), and the patient resources of resilience and coping strategies were included.

Results: We found three clusters that can be characterized as "pensioners with age-associated pain caused by degenerative diseases", "middle-aged patients with high mental distress and poor coping resources", and "middle-aged patients who are less pain-affected and better positioned with regard to their mental health".

Conclusions: Our results supported current knowledge concerning groups of CLBP patients in primary care. In particular, we identified a group that was most disabled and distressed, and which was mainly characterized by psychological variables. As shown in our study, pain-related coping strategies and resilience were low in these patients and might be addressed in differentiating treatment strategies. Future studies should focus on the identification of this group in order to achieve effective treatment allocation.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00003123.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:287–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friessem CH, Willweber-Strumpf A, Zenz MW. Chronische Schmerzen in deutschen Facharztpraxen. Die aktuelle Inanspruchnahme des ambulanten Gesundheitssystems anhand der Prävalenz von Schmerzen. . Schmerz. 2010;24:501–507. doi: 10.1007/s00482-010-0958-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999;354:581–585. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie Kreuzschmerz – Langfassung. [National guideline for low back pain - long version]. Version 1.2. Berlin; 2011.
    1. Dietl MKD. Versorgungssituation in der Schmerztherapie in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich hinsichtlich Über-, Unter- oder Fehlversorgung: HTA-Bericht. Köln: [Health care services of pain therapy in Germany – an international comparison regarding to over-, undersupply and inappropriate health care services]; 2011.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources