Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Nov;13(11):800-12.
doi: 10.1038/nrc3610. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

The microbiome and cancer

Affiliations
Review

The microbiome and cancer

Robert F Schwabe et al. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Microbiota and host form a complex 'super-organism' in which symbiotic relationships confer benefits to the host in many key aspects of life. However, defects in the regulatory circuits of the host that control bacterial sensing and homeostasis, or alterations of the microbiome, through environmental changes (infection, diet or lifestyle), may disturb this symbiotic relationship and promote disease. Increasing evidence indicates a key role for the bacterial microbiota in carcinogenesis. In this Opinion article, we discuss links between the bacterial microbiota and cancer, with a particular focus on immune responses, dysbiosis, genotoxicity, metabolism and strategies to target the microbiome for cancer prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mechanisms controlling host–microbiota interactions and associated failures implicated in cancer development
A state of homeostasis and symbiotic relationships is maintained by the separation of microbial entities from the host through a multi-level barrier, by a eubiotic microbiome that actively suppresses pathobionts and that maintains a symbiotic relationship with the host, and by a state of low inflammation in the host. Perturbation of this balance leads to chain reactions that ultimately result in a cancer-promoting state with a failing barrier, inflammation and dysbiosis. This state includes qualitative and sometimes quantitative changes in the microbiota; failure of the barrier either physically (for example, at the level of tight junctions or at the mucous layer), or at the level of antibacterial defence systems — either those of epithelial cells or those of cells from the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT); and increased inflammatory responses, which are often mediated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and downstream cytokines that promote epithelial cell proliferation and survival. DCA, deoxycholic acid; EREG, epiregulin; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IL-6, interleukin-6; MAMP, microorganism-associated molecular pattern; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; TH17, T helper 17; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mechanisms by which the bacterial microbiome modulates carcinogenesis
The bacterial microbiome promotes carcinogenesis through several mechanisms. a | Changes in the microbiome and host defences may favour increased bacterial translocation, leading to increased inflammation, which is mediated by microorganism-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) that activate Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in several cell types, including macrophages, myofibroblasts, epithelial cells and tumour cells. These effects may occur locally or through long-distance effects in other organs. b | Genotoxic effects are mediated by bacterial genotoxins — such as colibactin and cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) — that, after being delivered to the nucleus of host cells, actively induce DNA damage in organs that are in direct contact with the microbiome, such as the gastrointestinal tract. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) released from inflammatory cells such as macrophages, as well as hydrogen sulphide (H2S) from the bacterial microbiota, may also be genotoxic. c | Metabolic actions of the microbiome may result in the activation of genotoxins such as acetaldehyde, dietary nitrosamine and other carcinogens, in the metabolism of hormones such as oestrogen and testosterone, in the metabolism of bile acids and in alterations of energy harvest. The microbiota also mediates tumour suppressive effects (shown in green) through inactivation of carcinogens, through the generation of short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate and through the biological activation of cancer-preventing phytochemicals. Many of these tumorigenic and tumour-suppressive mediators exert both local and longdistance effects. AREG, amphiregulin; DCA, deoxycholic acid; EREG, epiregulin; IL, interleukin; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; NLR, NOD-like receptor; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; TH17, T helper 17; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Targeting the bacterial microbiota for therapeutic modulation of carcinogenesis
On the basis of the known contribution of the bacterial microbiota in experimental carcinogenesis, the approaches shown are conceivable for the prevention of human carcinogenesis.

References

    1. Koch R. Tenth International Congress of Medicine 1. August Hirschwald; Berlin: 1891.
    1. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357:539–545. - PubMed
    1. Trinchieri G. Cancer and inflammation: an old intuition with rapidly evolving new concepts. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:677–706. - PubMed
    1. Moore PS, Chang Y. Why do viruses cause cancer? Highlights of the first century of human tumour virology. Nature Rev Cancer. 2010;10:878–889. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Virchow R. In: Die krankhaften Geschwülste. Virchow R, editor. Verlag von August von Hirschwald; Berlin: 1863. pp. 57–101.

Publication types