Racial and socioeconomic disparities in pediatric and young adult liver transplant outcomes
- PMID: 24136785
- PMCID: PMC3950898
- DOI: 10.1002/lt.23769
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in pediatric and young adult liver transplant outcomes
Abstract
Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in liver transplantation (LT) outcomes among adults, but little research exists for pediatric LT populations. We examined racial differences in graft survival and mortality within a retrospective cohort of pediatric and young adult LT recipients at a large children's transplant center in the Southeast between 1998 and 2011. The association between race/ethnicity and rates of graft failure and mortality was examined with Cox proportional hazards models that were adjusted for demographic and clinical factors as well as individual-level and census tract-level socioeconomic status (SES). Among the 208 LT recipients, 51.0% were white, 34.6% were black, and 14.4% were other race/ethnicity. Graft survival and patient survival were higher for whites versus minorities 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after transplantation. The 10-year graft survival rates were 84% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 76%-91%] for white patients, 60% (95% CI = 46%-74%) for black patients, and 49% (95% CI = 23%-77%) for other race/ethnicity patients. The 10-year patient survival rates were 92% (95% CI = 84%-96%), 65% (95% CI = 52%-79%), and 76% (95% CI = 54%-97%) for the white, black, and other race/ethnicity groups, respectively. In analyses adjusted for demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic characteristics, the rates of graft failure [black: hazard ratio (HR) = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.29-5.45; other: HR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.23-7.35] and mortality (black: HR = 4.24, 95% CI = 1.54-11.69; other: HR = 3.09, 95% CI = 0.78-12.19) were higher for minority groups versus whites. In conclusion, at a large pediatric transplant center in the Southeastern United States, racial/ethnic disparities exist in pediatric and young adult LT outcomes that are not fully explained by measured SES and clinical factors.
© 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this article have no relevant conflicts of interest to report.
Figures
Comment in
-
Racial and economic disparities in transplant outcomes: the not-so-hidden morbidities.Liver Transpl. 2014 Jan;20(1):4-6. doi: 10.1002/lt.23801. Liver Transpl. 2014. PMID: 24288361 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ryckman FC, Bucuvalas JC, Nathan J, Alonso M, Tiao G, Balistreri WF. Outcomes following liver transplantation. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008;17:123–130. - PubMed
-
- Andrews WS, Wanek E, Fyock B, Gray S, Benser M. Pediatric liver transplantation: a 3-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 1989;24:77–82. - PubMed
-
- Berquist RK, Berquist WE, Esquivel CO, Cox KL, Wayman KI, Litt IF. Adolescent non-adherence: prevalence and consequences in liver transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2006;10:304–310. - PubMed
-
- Limbers CA, Neighbors K, Martz K, Bucuvalas JC, Webb T, Varni JW, Alonso EM for Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation Functional Outcomes Group. Health-related quality of life in pediatric liver transplant recipients compared with other chronic disease groups. Pediatr Transplant. 2011;15:245–253. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical