Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;21(11):2172-9.
doi: 10.1002/oby.20550. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

Calorie labeling, fast food purchasing and restaurant visits

Affiliations

Calorie labeling, fast food purchasing and restaurant visits

Brian Elbel et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Obesity is a pressing public health problem without proven population-wide solutions. Researchers sought to determine whether a city-mandated policy requiring calorie labeling at fast food restaurants was associated with consumer awareness of labels, calories purchased and fast food restaurant visits.

Design and methods: Difference-in-differences design, with data collected from consumers outside fast food restaurants and via a random digit dial telephone survey, before (December 2009) and after (June 2010) labeling in Philadelphia (which implemented mandatory labeling) and Baltimore (matched comparison city). Measures included: self-reported use of calorie information, calories purchased determined via fast food receipts, and self-reported weekly fast-food visits.

Results: The consumer sample was predominantly Black (71%), and high school educated (62%). Postlabeling, 38% of Philadelphia consumers noticed the calorie labels for a 33% point (P < 0.001) increase relative to Baltimore. Calories purchased and number of fast food visits did not change in either city over time.

Conclusions: While some consumers report noticing and using calorie information, no population level changes were noted in calories purchased or fast food visits. Other controlled studies are needed to examine the longer term impact of labeling as it becomes national law.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: the authors have no competing interests. BE was involved in conceptualizing the study, design, analysis plan, interpretation of results, and writing. TM was involved in design, analysis, interpretation of results and writing, BD was involved with design, interpretation and writing; CA was involved in design and writing; RK was involved in design, interpretation and writing. AA was involved in design, interpretation and writing; GO was involved with interpretation and writing. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted version.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. 111th Congress. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 2010. H.R. 3590, PL 111–148, sec. 4205(b)(i)–(iii).

    1. Harnack LJ, French SA, Oakes JM, Story MT, Jeffery RW, Rydell SA. Effect of point-of-purchase calorie labeling on restaurant and cafeteria food choices: a review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swartz JJ, Braxton D, Viera AJ. Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: an updated systematic review of the literature. Int J Beh Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chu YH, Frongillo CA, Jones SJ, Kaye GL. Improving patrons’ meal selections through the use of point-of-selection nutrition labels. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2001–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elbel B, Kersh R, Brescoll BL, Dixon LB. Calorie labeling and food choices: a first look at the effects on low-income people in New York City. Health Aff. 2009;28:w1110–w1121. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources