Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 16:4:742.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00742. eCollection 2013.

Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms

Affiliations

Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms

Jonathan D Jackson et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Recent research has examined how often mind-wandering occurs about past vs. future events. However, mind-wandering may also be atemporal, although previous investigations of this possibility have not yielded consistent results. Indeed, it is unclear what proportion of mind-wandering is atemporal, and also how an atemporal response option would affect the future-oriented bias often reported during low-demand tasks used to measure mind-wandering. The present study examined self-reported (Experiment 1) and probe-caught (Experiment 2) mind-wandering using the low-demand Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) in younger (18-30) and older (50-73) adults in an experimental paradigm developed to measure mind-wandering using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (Mturk). Across self-reported and probe-caught mind-wandering, the atemporal response option was used at least as frequently as past or future mind-wandering options. Although older adults reported far fewer mind-wandering events, they showed a very similar temporal pattern to younger adults. Most importantly, inclusion of the atemporal report option affected performance on the SART and selectively eliminated the prospective bias in self-reported mind-wandering, but not in probe-caught mind-wandering. These results suggest that both young and older participants are often not thinking of past or future events when mind-wandering, but are thinking of events that cannot easily be categorized as either.

Keywords: SART; aging; mind-wandering; prospection; retrospection; task-unrelated thought; temporal focus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Raw counts of past- and future-oriented mind-wandering for younger adults (panel A) and older adults (panel B) with and without the atemporal in Experiment 1. For participants with the atemporal option, counts for that response option are also shown. Error bars on all figures represent 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportions of past- and future-oriented mind-wandering for younger adults (panel A) and older adults (panel B) with and without the atemporal in Experiment 2.

References

    1. Addis D. R., Musicaro R., Pan L., Schacter D. L. (2010). Episodic simulation of past and future events in older adults: evidence from an experimental recombination task. Psychol. Aging 25, 369 10.1037/a0017280 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addis D. R., Roberts R. P., Schacter D. L. (2011). Age-related neural changes in autobiographical remembering and imagining. Neuropsychologia 49, 3656–3669 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addis D. R., Wong A. T., Schacter D. L. (2008). Age-related changes in the episodic simulation of future events. Psychol. Sci. 19, 33–41 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02043.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews-Hanna J. R., Reidler J. S., Huang C., Buckner R. L. (2010). Evidence for the default network's role in spontaneous cognition. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 322–335 10.1152/jn.00830.2009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antrobus J. S., Antrobus J. S., Singer J. L. (1964). Eye movements accompanying daydreaming, visual imagery, and thought suppression. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 69, 244 10.1037/h0041846 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources