Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb;97(2):506-12.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.048. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

HeartWare and HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices as bridge to transplantation: a comparative analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

HeartWare and HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices as bridge to transplantation: a comparative analysis

Veli K Topkara et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to comparatively analyze outcomes of heart transplant patients bridged to transplantation with HeartWare (HW-VAD) versus HeartMate II (HMII-VAD) left ventricular assist devices.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing Database was reviewed to identify first-time heart transplant recipients who were bridged to transplantation with either HW-VAD (n=141) or HMII-VAD (n=1824) from January 2009 through July 2012.

Results: Recipients of HW-VAD had a higher proportion of female patients (27.0% versus 18.9%; p=0.019), a lower body surface area (2.01±0.25 m2 versus 2.06±0.25 m2; p=0.035), and a trend toward a higher peak percentage of panel reactive antibody against human leukocyte class I antigens (40.4%±32.8% versus 33.0%±30.4%; p=0.070). Pretransplantation recipient cardiac index (2.33±0.66 L⋅min(-1)⋅m(-2) versus 2.33±0.68 L⋅min(-1)⋅m(-2)), serum creatinine (1.21±0.43 mg/dL versus 1.26±0.57 mg/dL), and total bilirubin (1.34±3.45 mg/dL versus 1.06±1.84 mg/dL) were comparable between the two groups (p>0.05 for all comparisons). After transplantation, there were no significant differences in freedom from rejection or freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Posttransplant graft survival rates were similar between the HW-VAD group and the HMII-VAD group at 1, 2, and 3 years (88.4% versus 87.8%, 79.9% versus 83.8%, and 77.4% versus 79.9%, respectively; p=0.843).

Conclusions: These findings suggest similar hemodynamic unloading, pretransplant end-organ function, and posttransplant outcomes in patients bridged to transplantation with both the HW-VAD and HMII-VAD.

Keywords: 27; 34.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Device Implants by Transplant Year
A) Number of Heartware and Heartmate II LVAD implants by transplant year. * Data until 6/2012. B) Percentage of Heartware LVAD implants by transplant year
Figure 2
Figure 2. Post-transplant Graft Survival
Figure 3
Figure 3. Freedom from Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy and Hospitalization for Rejection

Comment in

  • Invited commentary.
    Ghodsizad A, Brehm C, Koerner MM, Elbanayosy A. Ghodsizad A, et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):512-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.037. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24484793 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Frazier OH, Rose EA, Macmanus Q, et al. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:1080–1090. - PubMed
    1. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435–1443. - PubMed
    1. Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, et al. Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation. 2007;116:497–505. - PubMed
    1. Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:885–896. - PubMed
    1. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2241–2251. - PubMed

Publication types