HeartWare and HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices as bridge to transplantation: a comparative analysis
- PMID: 24140211
- PMCID: PMC4311400
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.048
HeartWare and HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices as bridge to transplantation: a comparative analysis
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to comparatively analyze outcomes of heart transplant patients bridged to transplantation with HeartWare (HW-VAD) versus HeartMate II (HMII-VAD) left ventricular assist devices.
Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing Database was reviewed to identify first-time heart transplant recipients who were bridged to transplantation with either HW-VAD (n=141) or HMII-VAD (n=1824) from January 2009 through July 2012.
Results: Recipients of HW-VAD had a higher proportion of female patients (27.0% versus 18.9%; p=0.019), a lower body surface area (2.01±0.25 m2 versus 2.06±0.25 m2; p=0.035), and a trend toward a higher peak percentage of panel reactive antibody against human leukocyte class I antigens (40.4%±32.8% versus 33.0%±30.4%; p=0.070). Pretransplantation recipient cardiac index (2.33±0.66 L⋅min(-1)⋅m(-2) versus 2.33±0.68 L⋅min(-1)⋅m(-2)), serum creatinine (1.21±0.43 mg/dL versus 1.26±0.57 mg/dL), and total bilirubin (1.34±3.45 mg/dL versus 1.06±1.84 mg/dL) were comparable between the two groups (p>0.05 for all comparisons). After transplantation, there were no significant differences in freedom from rejection or freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Posttransplant graft survival rates were similar between the HW-VAD group and the HMII-VAD group at 1, 2, and 3 years (88.4% versus 87.8%, 79.9% versus 83.8%, and 77.4% versus 79.9%, respectively; p=0.843).
Conclusions: These findings suggest similar hemodynamic unloading, pretransplant end-organ function, and posttransplant outcomes in patients bridged to transplantation with both the HW-VAD and HMII-VAD.
Keywords: 27; 34.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures



Comment in
-
Invited commentary.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):512-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.037. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24484793 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of sensitization in US heart transplant recipients bridged with a ventricular assist device: update in a modern cohort.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Nov;142(5):1236-45, 1245.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 11. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011. PMID: 21839482 Free PMC article.
-
The association of pretransplant HeartMate II left ventricular assist device placement and heart transplantation mortality.ASAIO J. 2014 May-Jun;60(3):294-9. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000065. ASAIO J. 2014. PMID: 24614355
-
Survival After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation in Patients Undergoing Bridge to Transplantation With the HeartWare HVAD Versus the Heartmate II.Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 May;103(5):1505-1511. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.060. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017. PMID: 27765177
-
Relationship between bridging with ventricular assist device on rejection after heart transplantation.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Mar;24(3):310-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.12.008. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005. PMID: 15737758
-
State of the art: implantable ventricular assist devices.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009 Oct;14(5):554-9. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283303750. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009. PMID: 19667990 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanical circulatory support in heart failure.Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016 Jun;13(2):130-4. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2016.61046. Epub 2016 Jun 30. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016. PMID: 27516785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of Genetic Polymorphisms in the Development of Complications in Patients with Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Devices: HeartWare, HeartMate II, and HeartMate 3.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 22;12(23):7235. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237235. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38068287 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac surgery 2014 reviewed.Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Dec;104(12):1006-20. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0914-4. Epub 2015 Sep 24. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26404007 Review.
-
The impact of preoperative kidney replacement therapy on kidney outcome and survival in patients with left ventricular assist device.Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2157285. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2157285. Ren Fail. 2023. PMID: 36763000 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Frazier OH, Rose EA, Macmanus Q, et al. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:1080–1090. - PubMed
-
- Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435–1443. - PubMed
-
- Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, et al. Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation. 2007;116:497–505. - PubMed
-
- Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:885–896. - PubMed
-
- Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2241–2251. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical