Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Feb;29(2):305-11.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2651-6. Epub 2013 Oct 19.

Chronic opioid therapy risk reduction initiative: impact on urine drug testing rates and results

Affiliations
Observational Study

Chronic opioid therapy risk reduction initiative: impact on urine drug testing rates and results

Judith A Turner et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Background: In response to epidemic levels of prescription opioid overdose, abuse, and diversion, routine urine drug tests (UDTs) are recommended for patients receiving chronic opioid therapy (COT) for chronic pain. However, UDT ordering for COT patients is inconsistent in primary care, and little is known about how to increase UDT ordering or the impact of increased testing on rates of aberrant results.

Objective: To compare rates and results of UDTs for COT patients before versus after implementation of an opioid risk reduction initiative in a large healthcare system.

Design: Pre-post observational study.

Patients: Group Health patients on COT October 2008-September 2009 (N = 4,821), October 2009-September 2010 (N = 5,081), and October 2010-September 2011 (N = 5,498).

Intervention: Multi-faceted opioid risk reduction initiative.

Main measures: Annual rates of UDTs and UDT results.

Key results: Half of COT patients received at least one UDT in the year after the initiative was implemented, compared to only 7 % 2 years prior. The adjusted odds of COT patients having at least one UDT in the first year of the opioid initiative were almost 16 times (adjusted OR = 15.79; 95 % CI: 13.96-17.87) those 2 years prior. The annual rate of UDT detection of marijuana and illicit drugs did not change (12.6 % after initiative implementation), and largely reflected marijuana use (detected in 11.1 % of all UDTs in the year after initiative implementation). In the year after initiative implementation, 10.7 % of UDTs were negative for opioids.

Conclusions: The initiative appeared to dramatically increase urine drug testing of COT patients in the healthcare system without impacting rates of aberrant results. The large majority of aberrant results reflected marijuana use or absence of opioids in the urine. The utility of increased urine drug testing for COT patient safety and prevention of diversion remains uncertain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percent of chronic opioid therapy patients who received at least one UDT in each year by opioid dose group.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Starrels JL, Becker WC, Alford DP, Kapoor A, Williams A, Turner BJ. Systematic review: treatment agreements and urine drug testing to reduce opioid misuse in patients with chronic pain. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:712–20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warner M, Chen LH, Makuc DM, Anderson RN, Minino AM. Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980–2008. NCHS data brief, no. 81. Hyattsville, MD, 2011. - PubMed
    1. Starrels J, Becker W, Weiner M, Li X, Heo M, Turner B. Low use of opioid risk reduction strategies in primary care even for high risk patients with chronic pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:958–64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1648-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bohnert ASB, Valenstein M, Bair MJ, et al. Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. JAMA. 2011;305(13):1315–21. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.370. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Volkow ND, McLellan TA. Curtailing diversion and abuse of opioid analgesics without jeopardizing pain treatment. JAMA. 2011;305(13):1346–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.369. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances