Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;31(3):278-84.
doi: 10.1590/S0103-05822013000300002.

Profile and scientific production of Brazilian National Council of Technological and Scientific Development researchers in Pediatrics

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

Profile and scientific production of Brazilian National Council of Technological and Scientific Development researchers in Pediatrics

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Maria Christina L Oliveira et al. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the profile and the scientific production of researchers in Pediatrics with scholarship from the National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development.

Methods: The Lattes curricula of 34 researchers in Pediatrics with active scholarships, from 2006 to 2008 were included in the analysis. The variables of interest were: gender, affiliation, time since PHD, tutoring of undergraduate students, mentorship of masters and doctors, scientific production and the papers' impact.

Results: In a total of 411 researchers in Medicine, 34 (8%) belonged to Pediatrics. Males (77%) and scholars in the category 2 of productivity (62%) prevailed. Three states of Brazil were responsible for approximately 90% of the researchers: São Paulo (53%), Minas Gerais (21%), and Rio Grande do Sul (15%). During their academic career, the Pediatrics researchers have published 3,122 articles with a median of 89 articles per researcher (interquartile range - IQ=51-119). Of the total, 40 and 59% articles were indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, respectively. The Pediatrics researchers have published papers in 599 journals with a median impact factor of 2.35 (IQ=1.37-3.73) for the 323 indexed journals.

Conclusions: The Pediatrics researchers have a relevant scientific output from the quantity point of the view, but there is a need to improve quality.

OBJETIVO:: Evaluar el perfil y la producción científica de los investigadores en Pediatría catastrados como becarios de productividad científica del Consejo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico.

MÉTODOS:: Se incluyó en el análisis el currículo Lattes de 34 investigadores en Pediatría con becas activas en el trienio 2006 a 2008. Las variables de interés fueron: sexo, institución, tiempo de doctoramiento, orientación de alumnos de la carrera, maestros y doctores, artículos publicados e impacto de la publicación.

RESULTADOS:: De un total de 411 investigadores en Medicina, 34 (8%) fueron identificados como del área de Pediatría. Hubo una predominancia del género masculino (77%) y de becarios en la categoría 2 (62%). Tres provincias fueron responsables por un 90% de los investigadores: São Paulo (53%), Minas Gerais (21%) y Rio Grande do Sul (15%). En el total de la carrera académica, los investigadores en Pediatría publicaron 3.122 artículos, siendo la mediana de 89 artículos por investigador (intervalo intercuartil - IQ=51-119). De ese total, 40 y 58,5% fueron artículos indexados en las bases de datos Web of Science y Scopus, respectivamente. Los investigadores en Pediatría publicaron en 599 periódicos, con mediana de factor de impacto de 2,35 (IQ=1,37-3,73) para los 323 periódicos indexados.

CONCLUSIONES:: En la presente investigación, se observó que los investigadores en el área de Pediatría presentan una producción científica relevante desde la mirada cuantitativa, pero hay necesidad de perfeccionamiento cualitativo de las publicaciones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflito de interesse: nada a declarar

Figures

Graph 1
Graph 1. Median of articles published/year across their scientific career and in the last 5 years by 34 CNPq researchers in the area of Pediatrics
Graph 2
Graph 2. Distribution of the Impact Factor of the journals in which articles by CNPq researchers in Pediatrics were published. The graph shows the distribution of the Impact Factor to the limit of 15 (11 journals with greater values were excluded in the presentation of the graph)
Gráfico 1
Gráfico 1. Mediana de artigos publicados/ano em toda a carreira científica e nos últimos cinco anos por 34 pesquisadores do CNPq com área de atuação em Pediatria
Gráfico 2
Gráfico 2. Distribuição do Fator de Impacto dos periódicos nos quais foram publicados os artigos dos pesquisadores do CNPq com área de atuação em Pediatria. O gráfico mostra a distribuição do Fator de Impacto até o limite de 15 (11 periódicos com valores acima foram excluídos na apresentação do gráfico)

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldani MZ, Gurgel RQ, Blank D, Gerolin J, Mari JJ. Pursuing efficiency: international visibility of the scientific production of Brazilian graduate programs in child and adolescent health from 1998 through 2003. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2007;83:436–440. - PubMed
    1. King DA. The scientific impact of nations. Nature. 2004;430:311–316. - PubMed
    1. Pinheiro-Machado R, de Oliveira PL. The Brazilian investment in science and technology. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2001;34:1521–1530. - PubMed
    1. Zorzetto R, Razzouk D, Dubugras MT, Gerolin J, Schor N, Guimarães JA, et al. The scientific production in health and biological sciences of the top 20 Brazilian universities. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39:1513–1520. - PubMed
    1. Petherick A. High hopes for Brazilian science. Nature. 2010;465:674–675. - PubMed

Publication types