Cross-cultural analysis of the motor development of Brazilian, Greek and Canadian infants assessed with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
- PMID: 24142318
- PMCID: PMC4182973
- DOI: 10.1590/S0103-05822013000300012
Cross-cultural analysis of the motor development of Brazilian, Greek and Canadian infants assessed with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
Abstract
Objective: To compare the motor development of infants from three population samples (Brazil, Canada and Greece), to investigate differences in the percentile curves of motor development in these samples, and to investigate the prevalence of motor delays in Brazilian children.
Methods: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study with 795 Brazilian infants from zero to 18 months of age, assessed by the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) at day care centers, nurseries, basic health units and at home. The Brazilian infants' motor scores were compared to the results of two population samples from Greece (424 infants) and Canada (2,400 infants). Descriptive statistics was used, with one-sample t-test and binomial tests, being significant p ≤ 0.05.
Results: 65.4% of Brazilian children showed typical motor development, although with lower mean scores. In the beginning of the second year of life, the differences in the motor development among Brazilian, Canadian and Greek infants were milder; at 15 months of age, the motor development became similar in the three groups. A non-linear motor development trend was observed.
Conclusions: The lowest motor percentiles of the Brazilian sample emphasized the need for national norms in order to correctly categorize the infant motor development. The different ways of motor development may be a consequence of cultural differences in infant care.
OBJETIVO:: Comparar el desarrollo motor de niños de tres muestras poblacionales (Brasil, Canadá y Grecia), verificar las diferencias en las curvas de percentiles del desarrollo motor para esas muestras e investigar la prevalencia de retardos motores en niños brasileños.
MÉTODOS:: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal, del que participaron 795 niños brasileños con edad entre 0 y 18 meses, evaluados con la Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) en las escuelas infantiles, maternidades, unidades de salud pública y en domicilio. Los escores motores de niños brasileños fueron comparados a los resultados de investigaciones con los grupos poblacionales de Grecia (424 niños) y de Canadá (2.400 niños). Se utilizó la estadística descriptiva, con las pruebas one-sample t-test y binominal, siendo significante p≤0,05.
RESULTADOS:: Se observó que el 65,4% de los niños brasileños presentaron desempeño motor normal, aunque con escores medianos más bajos que los otros grupos. En el inicio del segundo año de vida, las diferencias de desempeño entre los niños brasileños, canadienses y griegos se redujeron y, a los 15 meses, el desempeño motor se hizo semejante. Se verificó tendencia de adquisiciones motoras no lineales.
CONCLUSIONES:: Los percentiles más bajos de la muestra brasileña reforzaron la necesidad de usarse normas nacionales para categorizar adecuadamente el desempeño motor. Los distintos recorridos del desarrollo motor son posiblemente decurrentes de diferencias culturales en el cuidado del niño.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflito de interesse: nada a declarar
Figures




Similar articles
-
New Brazilian developmental curves and reference values for the Alberta infant motor scale.Infant Behav Dev. 2016 Nov;45(Pt A):38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 13. Infant Behav Dev. 2016. PMID: 27636655
-
Canadian and Brazilian Percentile Ranks for the Alberta Infant Motor Scale.Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022;42(6):635-644. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2022.2073798. Epub 2022 May 10. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35538717
-
Reference curves for the Brazilian Alberta Infant Motor Scale: percentiles for clinical description and follow-up over time.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2012 Jan-Feb;88(1):40-7. doi: 10.2223/JPED.2142. Epub 2011 Nov 4. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2012. PMID: 22057554
-
Cross-country validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale using a Brazilian sample.Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Jul-Aug;25(4):444-449. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 16. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021. PMID: 33386255 Free PMC article.
-
The Alberta Infant Motor Scale: A tool for the assessment of motor aspects of neurodevelopment in infancy and early childhood.Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 14;13:927502. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.927502. eCollection 2022. Front Neurol. 2022. PMID: 36188401 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Psychometric properties of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and culturally adapted or translated versions when used for infant populations internationally: A systematic review.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Feb;67(2):165-176. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16070. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025. PMID: 39234875 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) as a Diagnostic Scale for Infants with Autism.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 9;13(6):1045. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061045. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36980353 Free PMC article.
-
Gross motor skills trajectory variation between WEIRD and LMIC countries: A cross-cultural study.PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0267665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267665. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35511788 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of the Alberta Infants Motor Scale in Norwegian infants aged 6-9 months through comparison with Canadian and Dutch scores.Front Pediatr. 2025 Jan 14;12:1511965. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1511965. eCollection 2024. Front Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 39877336 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Clark JE, Metcalfe JS. The mountain of motor development: a metaphor. In: Clark JE, Humphrey JH, editors. Motor development: research and reviews. Reston: Naspe; 2002.
-
- Blackman JA. Early intervention: a global perspective. Inf Young Children. 2002;15:11–19.
-
- Blauw-Hospers CH, de Graaf-Peters VB, Dirks T, Bos AF, Hadders-Algra M. Does early intervention in infants at high risk for a developmental motor disorder improve motor and cognitive development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31:1201–1212. - PubMed
-
- Vanderveen JA, Bassler D, Robertson CM, Kirpalani H. Early interventions involving parents to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature infants: a meta-analysis. J Perinatol. 2009;29:343–351. - PubMed
-
- Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:254–266. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical