Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Sep;17(3):98-106.
doi: 10.5213/inj.2013.17.3.98. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

Development of implantable medical devices: from an engineering perspective

Affiliations
Review

Development of implantable medical devices: from an engineering perspective

Yeun-Ho Joung. Int Neurourol J. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

From the first pacemaker implant in 1958, numerous engineering and medical activities for implantable medical device development have faced challenges in materials, battery power, functionality, electrical power consumption, size shrinkage, system delivery, and wireless communication. With explosive advances in scientific and engineering technology, many implantable medical devices such as the pacemaker, cochlear implant, and real-time blood pressure sensors have been developed and improved. This trend of progress in medical devices will continue because of the coming super-aged society, which will result in more consumers for the devices. The inner body is a special space filled with electrical, chemical, mechanical, and marine-salted reactions. Therefore, electrical connectivity and communication, corrosion, robustness, and hermeticity are key factors to be considered during the development stage. The main participants in the development stage are the user, the medical staff, and the engineer or technician. Thus, there are three different viewpoints in the development of implantable devices. In this review paper, considerations in the development of implantable medical devices will be presented from the viewpoint of an engineering mind.

Keywords: Biocompatible materials; Biomedical engineering; Medical electronics; Micro-electro-mechanical systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Material-dependent permeability. The graph shows also permeability as a function of thickness.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Implantable blood pressure sensor. (A) Surgically implanted blood pressure sensor with a cuff-type design. The sensor is installed on the blood vessel directly. (B) Cardiomems implantable blood pressure sensor. The sensor is paced in the target position by use of a delivery system. The sensor is delivered by the same procedure with a stent.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ISO 13485:2003. Medical devices -- Quality management systems -- Requirements for regulatory purposes [Internet] Geneva: Switzerland: [cited 2013 Jun 15]. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=36786.
    1. Johnson JA. FDA regulation of medical devices. Congressional research service, June 25, 2012 [Internet] Washington, DC: Federation of American Scientists; c2013. [cited 2013 Jul 13]. Available from: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42130.pdf.
    1. Jiang G, Zhou DD. Technology advances and challenges in hermetic packaging for implantable medical devices. In: Zhou DD, Greenbaum ES, editors. Implantable neural prostheses 2: techniques and engineering approaches. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 28–61.
    1. Zoll PM. Resuscitation of the heart in ventricular standstill by external electric stimulation. N Engl J Med. 1952;247:768–771. - PubMed
    1. Greatbatch W, Holmes CF. History of implantable devices. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1991;10:38–41. - PubMed