Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Dec 10;185(18):E827-37.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130430. Epub 2013 Oct 21.

Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortality

Review

Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortality

Lars G Hemkens et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Many clinical trials examine a composite outcome of admission to hospital and death, or infer a relationship between hospital admission and survival benefit. This assumes concordance of the outcomes "hospital admission" and "death." However, whether the effects of a treatment on hospital admissions and readmissions correlate to its effect on serious outcomes such as death is unknown. We aimed to assess the correlation and concordance of effects of medical interventions on admission rates and mortality.

Methods: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from its inception to January 2012 (issue 1, 2012) for systematic reviews of treatment comparisons that included meta-analyses for both admission and mortality outcomes. For each meta-analysis, we synthesized treatment effects on admissions and death, from respective randomized trials reporting those outcomes, using random-effects models. We then measured the concordance of directions of effect sizes and the correlation of summary estimates for the 2 outcomes.

Results: We identified 61 meta-analyses including 398 trials reporting mortality and 182 trials reporting admission rates; 125 trials reported both outcomes. In 27.9% of comparisons, the point estimates of treatment effects for the 2 outcomes were in opposite directions; in 8.2% of trials, the 95% confidence intervals did not overlap. We found no significant correlation between effect sizes for admission and death (Pearson r = 0.07, p = 0.6). Our results were similar when we limited our analysis to trials reporting both outcomes.

Interpretation: In this metaepidemiological study, admission and mortality outcomes did not correlate, and discordances occurred in about one-third of the treatment comparisons included in our analyses. Both outcomes convey useful information and should be reported separately, but extrapolating the benefits of admission to survival is unreliable and should be avoided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Selection of included reviews.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Concordance of treatment effects on admission to hospital and death. CI = confidence interval.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Correlation of treatment effects on admission to hospital versus death. OR = odds ratio. Note: Two components with admission effects outside of the range (OR < 0.05) are not shown.,

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1418–28 - PubMed
    1. Joynt KE, Jha AK. Thirty-day readmissions — truth and consequences. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1366–9 - PubMed
    1. Cordoba G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S, et al. Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 2010;341:c3920. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freemantle N, Calvert M, Wood J, et al. Composite outcomes in randomized trials: Greater precision but with greater uncertainty? JAMA 2003;289:2554–9 - PubMed
    1. Montori VM, Permanyer-Miralda G, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, et al. Validity of composite end points in clinical trials. BMJ 2005; 330:594–6 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms