Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;15(1):42-60.
doi: 10.4161/cbt.26605. Epub 2013 Oct 3.

In vivo time-serial multi-modality optical imaging in a mouse model of ovarian tumorigenesis

Affiliations

In vivo time-serial multi-modality optical imaging in a mouse model of ovarian tumorigenesis

Jennifer M Watson et al. Cancer Biol Ther. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Identification of the early microscopic changes associated with ovarian cancer may lead to development of a diagnostic test for high-risk women. In this study we use optical coherence tomography (OCT) and multiphoton microscopy (MPM) (collecting both two photon excited fluorescence [TPEF] and second harmonic generation [SHG]) to image mouse ovaries in vivo at multiple time points. We demonstrate the feasibility of imaging mouse ovaries in vivo during a long-term survival study and identify microscopic changes associated with early tumor development. These changes include alterations in tissue microstructure, as seen by OCT, alterations in cellular fluorescence and morphology, as seen by TPEF, and remodeling of collagen structure, as seen by SHG. These results suggest that a combined OCT-MPM system may be useful for early detection of ovarian cancer.

Keywords: autofluorescence; cancer; multiphoton; non-linear microscopy; optical biopsy; optical coherence tomography; two-photon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. H&E stained sections for each diagnosis. Insets show higher magnification. (A) Normal cycling, (B) atrophic, (C) tubular hyperplasia, (D) cystic tumor, (E) fibrosarcoma, and (F) granulosa cell tumor.
None
Figure 2. Normal ovary OCT images. (A) Cross-section, (B) en face section. F, follicle; CL, corpus luteum; CT, connective tissue or fat; arrow points to bright edge.
None
Figure 3. Normal ovary MPM images. (A) TPEF from surface of the ovary. (B) TPEF image from deeper in the ovary. (C) SHG from the surface of the ovary. (D) SHG from deeper in ovary. E, epithelial cells; CL, corpus luteum; f , follicle; S, stroma; wide arrow points to bright cells in stroma; chevron points to theca cells; thin arrow points to granulosa cells; arrowhead points to thin net-like collagen structure; five-point stars indicate gaps in collagen structure in the stroma.
None
Figure 4. Normal ovary (CON/CON) time serial OCT images. (A) 6 mo, (B) 11 mo, and (C) 13 mo of age. F, follicle; CL, corpus luteum; CT, connective tissue or fat.
None
Figure 5. Normal ovary (CON/CON) time serial MPM maximum intensity projection images. (A–C) TPEF images. (D—F) SHG images. (A and D) from 6 mo, (B and E) from 11 mo, and (C and F) from 13 mo of age. Insets show detail from a single slice in stack.
None
Figure 6. Atrophy (CON/DMBA) development in time serial OCT images. (A) Six months (before DMBA dosing) and (B) at 13 mo of age (after DMBA dosing). F, follicle; CL, corpus luteum; CT, connective tissue; arrows point to small cysts.
None
Figure 7. Atrophy (CON/DMBA) development in time serial MPM maximum intensity projection images. (A and B) TPEF. (C and D) SHG. (A and C) are from 6 mo (before DMBA dosing) and (B and D) are from 13 mo of age (after DMBA dosing). Insets show detail from a single slice in the stack.
None
Figure 8. Tubular hyperplasia (VCD/CON) development in time serial OCT images. (A) 6 mo, (B) 11 mo, and (C) 13 mo of age. Cy, cyst; chevrons point to bursa; thin arrows point to small invaginations; thick arrows point to large invaginations.
None
Figure 9. Tubular hyperplasia (VCD/CON) development in time serial MPM maximum intensity projection images. (A–C) TPEF. (D–F) SHG. (A and D) are from the 6-mo time point, (B and E) are from the 11-mo time point, and (C and F) are from the 13-mo time point. Insets show detail from a single slice in the stack. Arrows point to hypointense tubules.
None
Figure 10. Cystic tumor (VCD/DMBA) development in time serial OCT images. (A) Six months, (B) 11 mo of age. CT, connective tissue; FT, fallopian tube; arrows point to small cysts.
None
Figure 11. Cystic tumor (VCD/DMBA) development in time serial MPM maximum intensity projection images. (A and B) TPEF. (C and D) SHG. (A and C) are from the 6-mo time point and (B and D) are from the 11-mo time point. Insets show detail from a single slice in the stack. Thin arrows point to blood vessels; wide arrow points to cells along the edge of a large follicle-like cyst.
None
Figure 12. Fibrosarcoma (CON/DMBA) development in time serial OCT images. (A) Six months (before DMBA dosing), (B) 13 mo of age (after DMBA dosing). CL, corpus luteum; f, follicle; thin arrows point to small cysts; wide arrow points to a deep invagination.
None
Figure 13. Fibrosarcoma (CON/DMBA) time serial development in MPM maximum intensity projection images. (A and B) TPEF. (C and D) SHG. (A and C) are from the 6-mo time point and (B and D) are from the 13-mo time point. Insets show detail from a single slice in the stack. Thin arrows point to spindle-shaped cells.
None
Figure 14. Granulosa cell tumor (VCD/DMBA) development in time serial OCT. (A) Six months, (B) 11 mo of age. Thin arrows point to punctate scatterers.
None
Figure 15. Granulosa cell tumor (VCD/DMBA) development in time serial MPM maximum intensity projection images. (A and B) TPEF. (C and D) SHG. (A and C) are from the 6-mo time point and (B and D) are from the 11-mo time point. Insets show detail. (B) Inset shows a cluster of granulosa cells.
None
Figure 16. Average fluorescent region area increases with age in this in vivo study. Results from a prior ex vivo study show a similar trend. Bars show the standard error of the mean.
None
Figure 17. Relative power in the low frequency band of the Fourier transform for each age. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
None
Figure 18. Dosing and imaging schedule.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marion SL, Watson J, Sen N, Brewer MA, Barton JK, Hoyer PB. 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced malignancies in a mouse model of menopause. Comp Med. 2013;63:6–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brewer MA, Utzinger U, Barton JK, Hoying JB, Kirkpatrick ND, Brands WR, Davis JR, Hunt K, Stevens SJ, Gmitro AF. Imaging of the ovary. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004;3:617–27. - PubMed
    1. Hariri LP, Liebmann ER, Marion SL, Hoyer PB, Davis JR, Brewer MA, Barton JK. Simultaneous optical coherence tomography and laser induced fluorescence imaging in rat model of ovarian carcinogenesis. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;10:438–47. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.5.12531. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hariri LP, Bonnema GT, Schmidt K, Winkler AM, Korde V, Hatch KD, Davis JR, Brewer MA, Barton JK. Laparoscopic optical coherence tomography imaging of human ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:188–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types