Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2014 Feb;42(2):362-8.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a6419f.

Adoption of ICU telemedicine in the United States

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Adoption of ICU telemedicine in the United States

Jeremy M Kahn et al. Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: ICU telemedicine is a novel approach for providing critical care services from a distance. We sought to study the extent of use and patterns of adoption of this technology in U.S. ICUs.

Design: Retrospective study combining a systematic listing of ICU telemedicine installations with hospital characteristic data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We examined adoption over time and compared hospital characteristics between facilities that have adopted ICU telemedicine and those that have not.

Setting: U.S. ICUs.

Setting: U.S. hospitals from 2002 to 2010.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The number of hospitals using ICU telemedicine increased from 16 (0.4% of total) to 213 (4.6% of total) between 2003 and 2010. The number of ICU beds covered by telemedicine increased from 598 (0.9% of total) to 5,799 (7.9% of total). The average annual rate of ICU bed coverage growth was 101% per year in the first four study years but slowed to 8.1% per year over the last four study years (p < 0.001 for difference in linear trend). Compared with non-adopting hospitals, hospitals adopting ICU telemedicine were more likely to be large (percentage with > 400 beds: 11.1% vs 3.7%, p < 0.001), teaching (percentage with resident coverage: 31.4% vs 21.9%, p = 0.003), and urban (percentage located in metropolitan statistical areas with more than 1 million residents: 45.3% vs 30.1%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: ICU telemedicine adoption was initially rapid but recently slowed. Efforts are needed to uncover the barriers to future growth, particularly regarding the optimal strategy for using this technology most effectively and efficiently.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Utilization of intensive care unit (ICU) telemedicine by year expressed as percentages of all United States hospitals (panel A) and percentages of United States ICU beds (panel B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographic distribution of intensive care unit (ICU) telemedicine. The circles indicate hospitals with ICU telemedicine, with the size of the markers proportional to the number of intensive care beds for each hospitals. The markers are overlaid onto Dartmouth Atlas hospital referral regions, which are shaded according to the proportion of covered ICU beds in the region.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garland A, Gershengorn HB. Staffing in ICUs: physicians and alternative staffing models. Chest. 2013;143:214–221. - PubMed
    1. Breslow MJ. Remote ICU care programs: current status. J Crit Care. 2007;22:66–76. - PubMed
    1. Lilly CM, Fisher KA, Ries M, et al. A national ICU telemedicine survey: validation and results. Chest. 2012;142:40–47. - PubMed
    1. Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, Dorman T, et al. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;288:2151–2162. - PubMed
    1. Siebig S, Kuhls S, Imhoff M, et al. Collection of annotated data in a clinical validation study for alarm algorithms in intensive care--a methodologic framework. J Crit Care. 2010;25:128–135. - PubMed

Publication types