Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb;103(2):107-16.
doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0626-6. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2): diagnostic and prognostic value in acute heart failure

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2): diagnostic and prognostic value in acute heart failure

Michael Behnes et al. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Background: As a mediator of ECM homeostasis, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) appears to be involved in adverse structural remodeling processes in the heart. However, the diagnostic and prognostic value of CTGF levels in acute heart failure (AHF) in addition to natriuretic peptide testing has not yet been evaluated.

Methods and results: A total of 212 patients presenting with acute dyspnea and/or peripheral edema to the Emergency Department were evaluated. CTGF and NT-proBNP plasma levels were measured at the initial presentation. All patients were followed up to 1 and 5 years. The first endpoint tested was the diagnostic non-inferiority of combined CTGF plus NT-proBNP compared to NT-proBNP alone for AHF diagnosis. Afterwards, the additional diagnostic value of CTGF plus NT-proBNP was tested. CTGF levels were higher in NYHA class III/IV and AHA/ACC class C/D patients compared to lower class patients (p = 0.04). Patients with HFREF revealed highest CTGF levels (median 93.3 pg/ml, IQR 18.2-972 pg/ml, n = 48) compared to patients with a normal heart function (i.e., without HFREF and HFPEF) (median 25.9, IQR <1-82.2 pg/ml, n = 37) (p < 0.05), followed by patients with HFPEF (median 82.2 pg/ml, IQR 11.5-447 pg/ml, n = 32) as assessed by echocardiography. Finally, CTGF levels were higher in patients with AHF (median 77.3 pg/ml, IQR 22.5-1012 pg/ml, n = 66) compared to those without (p = 0.002). CTGF plus NT-proBNP was non-inferior to NT-proBNP testing alone for AHF diagnosis (AUC difference 0.01, p > 0.05). CTGF plus NT-proBNP improved the diagnostic capacity for AHF (accuracy 82 %, specificity 83 %, positive predictive value 66 %, net reclassification improvement +0.11) compared to NT-proBNP alone (p = 0.0001). CTGF levels were not able to differentiate prognostic outcomes after 1 and 5 years.

Conclusions: Additional CTGF measurements might lead to a better discrimination of higher functional and structural heart failure stages and might identify patients of an increased risk for an acute cardiac decompensation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00143793.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998 Nov;30(11):2411-22 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):839-43 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 15;358(20):2148-59 - PubMed
    1. J Cell Commun Signal. 2010 Mar;4(1):73-4 - PubMed
    1. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;19(10):795-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources