Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e74988.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074988. eCollection 2013.

How safe is safe enough? Radiation risk for a human mission to Mars

Affiliations

How safe is safe enough? Radiation risk for a human mission to Mars

Francis A Cucinotta et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Astronauts on a mission to Mars would be exposed for up to 3 years to galactic cosmic rays (GCR)--made up of high-energy protons and high charge (Z) and energy (E) (HZE) nuclei. GCR exposure rate increases about three times as spacecraft venture out of Earth orbit into deep space where protection of the Earth's magnetosphere and solid body are lost. NASA's radiation standard limits astronaut exposures to a 3% risk of exposure induced death (REID) at the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) of the risk estimate. Fatal cancer risk has been considered the dominant risk for GCR, however recent epidemiological analysis of radiation risks for circulatory diseases allow for predictions of REID for circulatory diseases to be included with cancer risk predictions for space missions. Using NASA's models of risks and uncertainties, we predicted that central estimates for radiation induced mortality and morbidity could exceed 5% and 10% with upper 95% CI near 10% and 20%, respectively for a Mars mission. Additional risks to the central nervous system (CNS) and qualitative differences in the biological effects of GCR compared to terrestrial radiation may significantly increase these estimates, and will require new knowledge to evaluate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. GCR organ dose characterization at average solar minimum.
(A) The attenuation of annual GCR organ averaged doses versus depth of aluminum shielding for deep space, the martian surface, and for combined GCR and trapped protons in the ISS orbit. Calculations are for males absorbed dose (D) (mGy), solid cancer and leukemia risks (H) (mSv), and non-cancer effects (G) (mGy-Eq). Calculations on the martian surface consider its atmosphere with an 18 g/cm2 CO2 vertical height.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of %REID for solid cancer for particles represented by Z*22 for deep space, martian surface and ISS orbit for 20 g/cm2 shield.
The full GCR spectrum that traverse astronauts in deep space are more biologically damaging compared to the higher energy GCR that occur in low Earth orbit.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Estimates of the GCR organ doses over recent solar cycles at 0 and 20/cm2 of aluminum shielding (left axis) and the log of the 100 MeV integral proton fluence, which was shown to be a useful predictor of SPE organ doses after considering their variable energy spectra (11) (right axis).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Estimates of tissue specific %REIC, %PC for incidence and death and %REIC and %REID for 940-d Mars mission with average solar minimum conditions.
(A) Values are for an average 45-y female never smokers and (B) for an average 45-y male never smokers. Calculations assume 20 g/cm2 and 10 g/cm2 aluminum shielding for transit and martian surface, respectively. PC estimations are for 20 years post mission. All point assessments are bracketed by 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Comparison of %REID from cancer and circulatory diseases combined for several space exploration missions.
(A) Estimates are shown for 45-y old female and (B) male never-smokers. Calculations assume 20 g/cm2 and 10 g/cm2 aluminum shielding for transit vehicle and martian surface habitat, respectively. Error bars reflect the 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. National Research Council (1996) Radiation hazards to crews of interplanetary missions: biological issues and research strategies. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1996.
    1. Cucinotta FA, Schimmerling W, Wilson JW, Peterson LE, Saganti P, et al. (2001) Space radiation cancer risks and uncertainties for Mars missions. Radiation Research 156: 682–688. - PubMed
    1. Cucinotta FA, Durante M (2006) Cancer risk from exposure to galactic cosmic rays: implications for space exploration by human beings. The Lancet Oncology 7: 431–435. - PubMed
    1. National Council on Radiation Protection (2006) Information needed to make radiation protection recommendations for space missions beyond low-earth orbit. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 153, Bethesda MD.
    1. Cucinotta FA, Kim MY, Chappell L (2013) Space radiation cancer risk projections and uncertainties- 2012. NASA TP 2013-217375.

Publication types