Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 17;8(10):e77726.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077726. eCollection 2013.

Exposure is not enough: suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect

Affiliations

Exposure is not enough: suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect

Daniel de Zilva et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Passive exposure to neutral stimuli increases subsequent liking of those stimuli--the mere exposure effect. Because of the broad implications for understanding and controlling human preferences, the role of conscious awareness in mere exposure has received much attention. Previous studies have claimed that the mere exposure effect can occur without conscious awareness of the stimuli. In two experiments, we applied a technique new to the mere exposure literature, called continuous flash suppression, to expose stimuli for a controlled duration with and without awareness. To ensure the reliability of the awareness manipulation, awareness was monitored on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results show that under these conditions the mere exposure effect does not occur without conscious awareness. In contrast, only when participants were aware of the stimuli did exposure increase liking and recognition. Together these data are consistent with the idea that the mere exposure effect requires conscious awareness and has important implications for theories of memory and affect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stimuli, exposure procedure and results for suppressed and unsuppressed exposure conditions of Experiment 1.
(A) Contours were presented to the left eye while either visual noise patterns or visual noise patterns with a superimposed contour were rapidly flashed to the right eye. A contour (left eye) and visual noise patterns alone (right eye) resulted in the percept of only the visual noise patterns (suppressed). A contour (left eye) and visual noise patterns with a superimposed contour (right eye) resulted in the percept of the visual noise patterns and the contour (unsuppressed). (B) Mean ratings of pleasantness for stimuli given 0, 1, 10 or 20 suppressed or unsuppressed exposures. (C) Mean ratings of recognition for suppressed and unsuppressed stimuli as a function of exposure frequency. Error bars indicate standard error of the means (SEM).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean pleasantness (A) and recognition (B) for faces given 0, 1, 10 or 20 suppressed or unsuppressed exposures.
Error bars indicate ±SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zajonc RB (1968) Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure. J Pers Soc Psychol 9: 1–27 10.1037/h0025848 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dijksterhuis A, Smith PK (2002) Affective habituation: Subliminal exposure to extreme stimuli decreases their extremity. Emotion 2: 203–214 10.1037/15283542.2.3.203 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ball PM, Cantor GN (1974) White boys' ratings of pictures of Whites and Blacks as related to amount of familiarization. Percept Mot Skills 39: 883–890 10.2466/pms.1974.39.2.883 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Janiszewski C (1993) Preattentive mere exposure effects. J Consum Res 20: 376–392 10.2307/2489354 - DOI
    1. Pliner P (1982) The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite 3: 283–290 10.1016/S0195-6663(82)80026-3 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources