Exposure is not enough: suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect
- PMID: 24147067
- PMCID: PMC3798387
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077726
Exposure is not enough: suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect
Abstract
Passive exposure to neutral stimuli increases subsequent liking of those stimuli--the mere exposure effect. Because of the broad implications for understanding and controlling human preferences, the role of conscious awareness in mere exposure has received much attention. Previous studies have claimed that the mere exposure effect can occur without conscious awareness of the stimuli. In two experiments, we applied a technique new to the mere exposure literature, called continuous flash suppression, to expose stimuli for a controlled duration with and without awareness. To ensure the reliability of the awareness manipulation, awareness was monitored on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results show that under these conditions the mere exposure effect does not occur without conscious awareness. In contrast, only when participants were aware of the stimuli did exposure increase liking and recognition. Together these data are consistent with the idea that the mere exposure effect requires conscious awareness and has important implications for theories of memory and affect.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
The mere exposure effect for stimuli presented below recognition threshold: a failure to replicate.Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Apr;76(2):391-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.391. Percept Mot Skills. 1993. PMID: 8483644
-
Enhanced conscious processing and blindsight-like detection of fear-conditioned stimuli under continuous flash suppression.Exp Brain Res. 2017 Nov;235(11):3333-3344. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5064-7. Epub 2017 Aug 16. Exp Brain Res. 2017. PMID: 28815269
-
Salience theory of mere exposure: Relative exposure increases liking, extremity, and emotional intensity.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun;118(6):1118-1145. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000184. Epub 2020 Jan 23. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020. PMID: 31971441
-
The Anatomy of Non-conscious Recognition Memory.Trends Neurosci. 2016 Nov;39(11):707-711. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 14. Trends Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27751531 Review.
-
A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking.Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):459-498. doi: 10.1037/bul0000085. Epub 2017 Mar 6. Psychol Bull. 2017. PMID: 28263645 Review.
Cited by
-
Mere exposure effect(s) in the context of explicit memory search.Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1314-1327. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00935-3. Mem Cognit. 2019. PMID: 31144203
-
Conscious awareness is necessary to assess trust and mimic facial expressions, while pupils impact trust unconsciously.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 7;377(1863):20210183. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0183. Epub 2022 Sep 21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36126669 Free PMC article.
-
Inferring the direction of implied motion depends on visual awareness.J Vis. 2014 Apr 4;14(4):4. doi: 10.1167/14.4.4. J Vis. 2014. PMID: 24706951 Free PMC article.
-
Sustained invisibility through crowding and continuous flash suppression: a comparative review.Front Psychol. 2014 May 27;5:475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00475. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24904489 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Contribution of Attention to the Mere Exposure Effect for Parts of Advertising Images.Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 5;9:1635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01635. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30233470 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Janiszewski C (1993) Preattentive mere exposure effects. J Consum Res 20: 376–392 10.2307/2489354 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources