Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct 18;4(4):241-7.
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.241.

Methods of predicting vertebral body fractures of the lumbar spine

Affiliations
Review

Methods of predicting vertebral body fractures of the lumbar spine

Gurudattsingh B Sisodia. World J Orthop. .

Abstract

Lumbar vertebral body (VB) fractures are increasingly common in an ageing population that is at greater risk of osteoporosis and metastasis. This review aims to identify different models, as alternatives to bone mineral density (BMD), which may be applied in order to predict VB failure load and fracture risk. The most representative models are those that take account of normal spinal kinetics and assess the contribution of the cortical shell to vertebral strength. Overall, predictive models for VB fracture risk should encompass a range of important parameters including BMD, geometric measures and patient-specific factors. As interventions like vertebroplasty increase in popularity for VB fracture treatment and prevention, such models are likely to play a significant role in the clinical decision-making process. More biomechanical research is required, however, to reduce the risks of post-operative adjacent VB fractures.

Keywords: Bone mineral density; Fracture; Lumbar spine; Model; Osteoporosis; Prediction; Vertebral body.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Wedge compression fracture of a lumbar vertebrae. The lateral radiograph of the lumbar spine with an arrow demonstrating an osteoporotic compression fracture of the L2 vertebral body with significant collapse, in an elderly woman.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography-based finite element modelling of the vertebral body. The L3 vertebra from two individuals (one aged 70 and the second 64 years) modelled using voxels from 3D quantitative computed tomography, allowing estimation of bone mineral density. The model has been used to predict vertebral strength under axial compression, as illustrated by the colour scale. Overall vertebral strength were predicted as 4656 N in the younger patient (64 years) vs 6095 N in the older patient (70 years). Reproduced from Melton et al[5].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pathological fracture of a lumbar vertebra. Sagittal magnetic resonance imaging image displaying a pathological fracture of L1 vertebral body with collapse, secondary to metastatic infiltration (shown by arrow). The T12 vertebra also has metastatic deposits but is not fractured.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Finite element model of a metastatically-involved spinal motion segment. A: Vertebral ‘‘bulge’’ in the transverse plane determines the risk of burst fracture independent of endplate failure; B: Axial vertebral displacement denotes risk of endplate failure resulting in burst fracture. Reproduced from Whyne et al[7].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Vertebroplasty and stabilization surgery of lumbar spine. Intra-operative image intensifier lateral radiograph of the lumbar spine during vertebroplasty and posterior spinal instrumentation for osteoporotic compression fractures. polymethylmethacrylate bone cement is seen in the vertebral body and has been used to augment vertebral strength.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bouxsein ML, Melton LJ, Riggs BL, Muller J, Atkinson EJ, Oberg AL, Robb RA, Camp JJ, Rouleau PA, McCollough CH, et al. Age- and sex-specific differences in the factor of risk for vertebral fracture: a population-based study using QCT. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:1475–1482. - PubMed
    1. Andresen R, Werner HJ, Schober HC. Contribution of the cortical shell of vertebrae to mechanical behaviour of the lumbar vertebrae with implications for predicting fracture risk. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:759–765. - PubMed
    1. Baroud G, Vant C, Wilcox R. Long-term effects of vertebroplasty: adjacent vertebral fractures. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2006;16:265–280. - PubMed
    1. Augat P, Reeb H, Claes LE. Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:1356–1363. - PubMed
    1. Melton LJ, Riggs BL, Keaveny TM, Achenbach SJ, Hoffmann PF, Camp JJ, Rouleau PA, Bouxsein ML, Amin S, Atkinson EJ, et al. Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1885–1892. - PubMed