Abuse liability measures for use in analgesic clinical trials in patients with pain: IMMPACT recommendations
- PMID: 24148704
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.035
Abuse liability measures for use in analgesic clinical trials in patients with pain: IMMPACT recommendations
Abstract
Assessing and mitigating the abuse liability (AL) of analgesics is an urgent clinical and societal problem. Analgesics have traditionally been assessed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) designed to demonstrate analgesic efficacy relative to placebo or an active comparator. In these trials, rigorous, prospectively designed assessment for AL is generally not performed. The Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) convened a consensus meeting to review the available evidence and discuss methods for improving the assessment of the AL of analgesics in clinical trials in patients with pain. Recommendations for improved assessment include: (1) performing trials that include individuals with diverse risks of abuse; (2) improving the assessment of AL in clinical trials (eg, training study personnel in the principles of abuse and addiction behaviors, designing the trial to assess AL outcomes as primary or secondary outcome measures depending on the trial objectives); (3) performing standardized assessment of outcomes, including targeted observations by study personnel and using structured adverse events query forms that ask all subjects specifically for certain symptoms (such as euphoria and craving); and (4) collecting detailed information about events of potential concern (eg, unexpected urine drug testing results, loss of study medication, and dropping out of the trial). The authors also propose a research agenda for improving the assessment of AL in future trials.
Keywords: Abuse; Abuse liability; Clinical trial; Opioids; Prescription drug abuse; Risk of abuse; Study design.
Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The IMMPACT factor or IMMPACT strikes again!Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2243-2244. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.051. Epub 2013 Aug 2. Pain. 2013. PMID: 23911698 No abstract available.
-
Clinical trials: Measuring abuse liability--is the risk worth taking?Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Mar;10(3):131-3. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.16. Epub 2014 Feb 11. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014. PMID: 24514872 No abstract available.
References
-
- Adams EH, Breiner S, Cicero TJ, Geller A, Inciardi JA, Schnoll SH, Senay EC, Woody GE. A comparison of the AL of tramadol, NSAIDs, and hydrocodone in patients with chronic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006;31:465-476.
-
- Adams LL, Gatchel RJ, Robinson RC, Polatin P, Gajraj N, Deschner M, Noe C. Development of a self-report screening instrument for assessing potential opioid medication misuse in chronic pain patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;27:440-459.
-
- Akbik H, Butler SF, Budman SH, Fernandez K, Katz NP, Jamison RN. Validation and clinical application of the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006;32:287-293.
-
- Banta-Green CJ, Merrill JO, Doyle SR, Boudreay DM, Calsyn DA. Measurement of opioid problems among chronic pain patients in a general medical population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;104:43-49.
-
- Becker WC, Fraenkel L, Edelman EJ, Hold SR, Glover J, Kerns RD, Fiellin DA. Instruments to assess patient-reported safety, efficacy, or misuse of current opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review. PAIN® 2013;154:905–16.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
