Development and feasibility testing of decision support for patients who are candidates for a prophylactic implantable defibrillator: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 24148851
- PMCID: PMC4015905
- DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-346
Development and feasibility testing of decision support for patients who are candidates for a prophylactic implantable defibrillator: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Patients, identified to be at risk for but who have never experienced a potentially lethal cardiac arrhythmia, have the option of receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) as prophylaxis against sudden cardiac death - a primary prevention indication. In Canada, there is no clear framework to support patients' decision-making for these devices. Decision support, using a decision aid, could moderate treatment-related uncertainty and prepare patients to make well-informed decisions. Patient decision aids provide information on treatment options, risks, and benefits, to help patients clarify their values for outcomes of treatment options. The objectives of this research are: 1) develop a decision aid, 2) evaluate the decision aid, and 3) determine the feasibility of conducting a trial.
Methods/design: A development panel comprised of the core investigative team, health service researchers, decision science experts, cardiovascular healthcare practitioners, and ICD patient representatives will collaborate to provide input on the content and format of the aid. To generate probabilities to include in the aid, we will synthesize primary prevention ICD evidence. To obtain anonymous input about the facts and content, we will employ a modified Delphi process. To evaluate the draft decision aid will invite ICD patients and their families (n = 30) to rate its acceptability. After we evaluate the aid, to determine the feasibility, we will conduct a feasibility pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) in new ICD candidates (n = 80). Participants will be randomized to receive a decision aid prior to specialist consultation versus usual care. Results from the pilot RCT will determine the feasibility of research processes; inform sample size calculation, measure decision quality (knowledge, values, decision conflict) and the influence of health related quality of life on decision-making.
Discussion: Our study seeks to develop a decision aid, for patients offered their first ICD for prophylaxis against sudden cardiac death. This paper outlines the background and methods of a pilot randomized trial which will inform a larger multicenter trial. Ultimately, decision support prior to specialist consultation could enhance the decision-making process between patients, physicians, and families, associated with life-prolonging medical devices like the ICD.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01876173.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prospective observational study of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: study design and cohort description.J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Feb 22;2(1):e000083. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000083. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23525420 Free PMC article.
-
Mortality Implications of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Secondary Prevention Patients: Contrasting Mortality in Primary Prevention Patients From a Prospective Population-Based Registry.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 19;6(8):e006220. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006220. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28862957 Free PMC article.
-
Protein biomarkers identify patients unlikely to benefit from primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators: findings from the Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (PROSE-ICD).Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;7(6):1084-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001705. Epub 2014 Oct 1. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 25273351 Free PMC article.
-
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator indication in prevention of sudden cardiac death in difficult clinical situations: A French expert position paper.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 May;113(5):359-366. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 22. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020. PMID: 32334981 Review.
-
Decision-making regarding primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators among older adults.Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/clc.23315. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Clin Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 31867773 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Decision-Making Experiences of Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Oct;39(10):1061-1069. doi: 10.1111/pace.12943. Epub 2016 Sep 22. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016. PMID: 27566614 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions in randomised controlled trials in surgery: issues to consider during trial design.Trials. 2015 Sep 4;16:392. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0918-4. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26337522 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"I don't know exactly what you're referring to": the challenge of values elicitation in decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 28;12:1947-1954. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S173705. eCollection 2018. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018. PMID: 30319244 Free PMC article.
-
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1:CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6. PMID: 28402085 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Shared decision making in IBD: A novel approach to trial consent and timing.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Sep 8;16:100447. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100447. eCollection 2019 Dec. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019. PMID: 31538130 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tang AS, Ross H, Simpson CS, Mitchell LB, Dorian P, Goeree R. et al.Canadian cardiovascular society/Canadian heart rhythm society position paper on implantable cardioverter defibrillator use in Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2005;14:11A–18A. - PubMed
-
- Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De SG. et al.Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2010 update: a report from the American heart association.[erratum appears in circulation. 30 March 2010;121(12):e260 note: Stafford, Randall [corrected to Roger, Veronique L]] Circulation. 2010;14:e46–e215. - PubMed
-
- Connolly SJ, Hallstrom AP, Cappato R, Schron EB, Kuck KH, Zipes DP. et al.Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillator study. Cardiac arrest study Hamburg. Canadian implantable defibrillator study. Eur Heart J. 2000;14:2071–2078. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2476. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical