Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar 1;11(1):1-7.
eCollection 2012.

Acute effects of three different stretching protocols on the wingate test performance

Affiliations

Acute effects of three different stretching protocols on the wingate test performance

Bruno L Franco et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of different stretching exercises on the performance of the traditional Wingate test (WT). Fifteen male participants performed five WT; one for familiarization (FT), and the remaining four after no stretching (NS), static stretching (SS), dynamic stretching (DS), and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF). Stretches were targeted for the hamstrings, quadriceps, and calf muscles. Peak power (PP), mean power (MP), and the time to reach PP (TP) were calculated. The MP was significantly lower when comparing the DS (7.7 ± 0.9 W/kg) to the PNF (7.3 ± 0.9 W/kg) condition (p < 0.05). For PP, significant differences were observed between more comparisons, with PNF stretching providing the lowest result. A consistent increase of TP was observed after all stretching exercises when compared to NS. The results suggest the type of stretching, or no stretching, should be considered by those who seek higher performance and practice sports that use maximal anaerobic power.

Keywords: Static stretching; anaerobic power; dynamic stretching; proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart illustrating the study's research design and randomly-ordered conditions.FT – Familiarization trial; NS – Non-stretching condition; SS – Static Stretching; DS – Dynamic stretching; PNF – Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation; and WT – Wingate test.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean (bars) and SD values (w/kg) of the mean power (MP) and peak power (PP) from the Wingate Test trials performed after no stretching (NS), static stretching (SS), dynamic stretching (DS), and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Results of the Wingate Test trials from one participant highlighting instant where the peak power where found (circles), allowing one to observe that stretching tends to delay peak power.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Mean (bars) and SD values of the time (in seconds) taken to reach PP from the beginning of each Wingate Test (WT) trial : WT trials performed after no stretching (NS), static stretching (SS), dynamic stretching (DS), and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) are presented. ** represents the significant statistical difference (p < 0.001) found between NS and all other exercises.

References

    1. Akimoto T., Akama T., Tatsuno M., Saito M., Kono I.(2000)Effect of brief maximal exercise on circulating levels of interleukin-12.European Journal of Applied Physiology 881, 510-512 - PubMed
    1. Alter M.J.(1997)Sports stretch. 2nd edition. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL
    1. Avela J., Kyrolainen H., Komi P.V.(1999)Altered reflex sensitivity after repeated and prolonged passive muscle stretching.Journal of Applied Physiology 86, 1283–1291 - PubMed
    1. Avela J., Taija F., Tuomas L., Elina N., Komi P.V.(2004)Neural and mechanical responses of the triceps surae muscle group after 1 h of repeated fast passive stretches.Journal of Applied Physiology 96, 2325–2332 - PubMed
    1. Behm D.G., Bambury A., Cahill F., Power K.(2004)Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time.Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 36, 1397-402 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources