Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 1;12(3):475-80.
eCollection 2013.

Loading and concurrent synchronous whole-body vibration interaction increases oxygen consumption during resistance exercise

Affiliations

Loading and concurrent synchronous whole-body vibration interaction increases oxygen consumption during resistance exercise

Daniel H Serravite et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

Exercise is commonly used as an intervention to increase caloric output and positively affect body composition. A major challenge is the low compliance often seen when the prescribed exercise is associated with high levels of exertion. Whole-body vibration (WBV) may allow increased caloric output with reduced effort; however, there is limited information concerning the effect of WBV on oxygen consumption (VO2). Therefore, this study assessed the synergistic effects of resistance training and WBV on VO2. We examined VO2 at different loads (0%, 20%, and 40% body weight (BW)) and vibration intensities (No vibration (NV), 35HZ, 2-3mm (35L), 50Hz, 57mm (50H)) in ten men (26.5 ± 5.1 years). Data were collected during different stages (rest, six 30s sets of squatting, and recovery). Repeated measures ANOVA showed a stage x load x vibration interaction. Post hoc analysis revealed no differences during rest; however, a significant vibration x load interaction occurred during exercise. Both 35L and 50H produced greater VO2 than NV at a moderate load of 20%BW. Although 40%BW produced greater VO2 than 20%BW or 0%BW using NV, no significant difference in VO2 was seen among vibratory conditions at 40%BW. Moreover, no significant differences were seen between 50H and 35L at 20%BW and NV at 40%BW. During recovery there was a main effect for load. Post hoc analyses revealed that VO2 at 40%BW was significantly higher than 20%BW or 0%BW, and 20%BW produced higher VO2 than no load. Minute-by-minute analysis revealed a significant impact on VO2 due to load but not to vibratory condition. We conclude that the synergistic effect of WBV and active squatting with a moderate load is as effective at increasing VO2 as doubling the external load during squatting without WBV. Key PointsSynchronous whole body vibration in conjunction with moderate external loading (app 20% BW) can increase oxygen consumption to the same extent as heavier loading (40% BW) during performance of the parallel squat.While the application of synchronous whole body vibration had no effect on recovery oxygen, under bot vibratory and non-vibratory conditions, the heavier the external load the greater the recovery oxygen consumption levels.Regardless of vibratory condition, during the squatting exercise bout 40% BW produced higher heart rates than 20%BW or 0% BW, and 20% BW produced higher heart rates than 0% BW.There were strong trends toward higher heart rates in both vibratory conditions (50 Hz, 5-6mm; 35 Hz, 2-3 mm) than in the non-vibratory condition regardless of external loading.

Keywords: Energy expenditure; exercise prescription; weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Subject performing active squatting exercise on the synchronous WBV plate
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Oxygen consumption values due to vibratory and loading conditions during the exercise stage.* significantly different from the NV condition at 20%BW (p < 0.05).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Recovery oxygen consumption due to vibratory conditions. *significantly different from the NV condition (p<0.05). **significantly different than 20%BW (p < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abercromby A.F.J., Amonette W.E., Layne C.S., Mcfarlin B.K., Hinman M.R., Paloski W.H. (2007) Vibration exposure and biodynamic responses during whole-body vibration training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 39(10), 1794-1800 - PubMed
    1. Adams J.B., Edwards D., Serravite D.H., Bedient A.M., Huntsman E., Jacobs K.A., Del Rossi G., Roos B.A., Signorile J.F. (2009) Optimal frequency, displacement, duration, and recovery patterns to maximize power output following acute whole-body vibration. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 23(1), 237-245 - PubMed
    1. Burgomaster K.A., Howarth K.R., Phillips S.M., Rakobowchuk M., Macdonald M.J., Mcgee S.L., Gibala M.J. (2008) Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. The Journal of Physiology 586(1), 151-160 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cardinale M., Lim J. (2003) Electromyography activity of vastus lateralis muscle during whole-body vibrations of different frequencies. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 17(3), 621-624 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane D.J., Sartor F., Winwood K., Stannard S.R., Narici M.V., Rittweger J. (2008) A comparison of the physiologic effects of acute whole-body vibration exercise in young and older people. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89(5), 815-821 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources