Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;30(2):857-62.
doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1463-6. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

Effect of pretreatment with an Er:YAG laser and fluoride on the prevention of dental enamel erosion

Affiliations

Effect of pretreatment with an Er:YAG laser and fluoride on the prevention of dental enamel erosion

Juliana dos Reis Derceli et al. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Er:YAG laser and its association with fluoride (1.23% acidulate phosphate fluoride gel) on the prevention of enamel erosion. Sixty specimens were obtained from bovine enamel (4 × 4 mm), which were ground flat, polished, and randomly divided into five groups according to the preventive treatments: control-fluoride application; L--Er:YAG laser; L+F--laser + fluoride; F+L--fluoride + laser; L/F--laser/fluoride simultaneously. Half of the enamel surface was covered with nail varnish (control area), and the other half was pretreated with one of the preventive strategies to subsequently be submitted to erosive challenge. When the laser was applied, it was irradiated for 10 s with a focal length of 4 mm and 60 mJ/2 Hz. Fluoride gel was applied for 4 min. Each specimen was individually exposed to regular Coca-Cola® for 1 min, four times/day, for 5 days. Wear analysis was performed with a profilometer, and demineralization was assessed with an optical microscope. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (wear)/Dunn test and ANOVA/Fisher's exact tests. The group L/F was similar to control group. The other groups showed higher wear, which did not present differences among them. In the demineralization assessment, the groups F+L and L/F showed lower demineralization in relation to the other groups. It can be concluded that none preventive method was able to inhibit dental wear. The treatments L/F and F+L showed lower enamel demineralization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2005 Mar;36(3):220-4 - PubMed
    1. Calcif Tissue Int. 1986 Apr;38(4):197-208 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Mar-Apr;17(2):75-86 - PubMed
    1. Adv Dent Res. 1987 Oct;1(1):21-6 - PubMed
    1. J Dent. 2010 Jul;38(7):534-40 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources